Refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients who have had myopic laser vision correction

被引:10
作者
Chean, Chung Shen [1 ]
Yong, Boon Kang Aw [1 ]
Comely, Samuel [1 ]
Maleedy, Deena [1 ]
Kaye, Stephen [1 ]
Batterbury, Mark [1 ]
Romano, Vito [1 ]
Arbabi, Esmaeil [1 ]
Hu, Victor [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, St Pauls Eye Unit, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Int Ctr Eye Hlth, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2019年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; DIOPTRIC POWER; EYES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000242
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective Prediction errors are increased among patients presenting for cataract surgery post laser vision correction (LVC) as biometric relationships are altered. We investigated the prediction errors of five formulae among these patients. Methods and analysis The intended refractive error was calculated as a sphero-cylinder and as a spherical equivalent for analysis. For determining the difference between the intended and postoperative refractive error, data were transformed into components of Long's formalism, before changing into sphero-cylinder notation. These differences in refractive errors were compared between the five formulae and to that of a control group using a Kruskal-Wallis test. An F-test was used to compare the variances of the difference distributions. Results 22 eyes post LVC and 19 control eyes were included for analysis. Comparing both groups, there were significant differences in the postoperative refractive error (p=0.038). The differences between the intended and postoperative refractive error were greater in post LVC eyes than control eyes (p=0.012), irrespective of the calculation method for the intended refractive error (p<0.01). The mean difference between the intended and postoperative refractive error was relatively small, but its variance was significantly greater among post LVC eyes than control eyes (p<0.01). Among post LVC eyes, there were no significant differences between the mean intended target refraction and between the intended and postoperative refractive error using five biometry formulae (p=0.76). Conclusion Biometry calculations were less precise for patients who had LVC than patients without LVC. No particular biometry formula appears to be superior among patients post LVC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Abulafia A, 2017, ASIA-PAC J OPHTHALMO, V6, P332, DOI 10.22608/APO.2017187
[2]  
Alcon Laboratories and the ASCRS Foundation, IOL POW CALC EYES HA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Refract Corneal Surg, V5, P202
[4]   Intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery: Double-K method [J].
Aramberri, J .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (11) :2063-2068
[5]   Intraocular lens power calculation after refractive surgery [J].
Argento, C ;
Cosentino, MJ ;
Badoza, D .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (07) :1346-1351
[6]   Evaluating Refractive Outcomes after Cataract Surgery [J].
Aristodemou, Petros ;
Sparrow, John M. ;
Kaye, Stephen .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 126 (01) :13-18
[7]   Estimation of true corneal power after keratorefractive surgery in eyes requiring cataract surgery: BESSt formula [J].
Borasio, Edmondo ;
Stevens, Julian ;
Smith, Guy T. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (12) :2004-2014
[8]   Intraocular lens bicylindric power calculation method: Using both flat and steep K readings to improve intraocular lens power prediction [J].
Calvo-Sanz, Jorge A. ;
Ruiz-Alcocer, Javier ;
Sanchez-Tena, Miguel A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 28 (05) :559-565
[9]   The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: when should IOLMaster biometric measurements be rechecked? [J].
Cartwright, N. E. Knox ;
Johnston, R. L. ;
Jaycock, P. D. ;
Tole, D. M. ;
Sparrow, J. M. .
EYE, 2010, 24 (05) :894-900
[10]   Metaanalysis of intraocular lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery in myopic eyes [J].
Chen, Xu ;
Yuan, Fei ;
Wu, Lianqun .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (01) :163-170