Facial Peri-implant Soft Tissue Topography of Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations and Relationship to Adjacent Teeth: A Retrospective Analysis

被引:1
作者
Koutouzis, Theofilos [1 ]
Podaru, Alexander [1 ]
Neiva, Rodrigo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Periodontol, Coll Dent, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
bone loss; clinical study; dental implants; radiology; retrospective study; subcrestal; TOOTH IMPLANTS; ABUTMENT INTERFACE; ANTERIOR MAXILLA; ALVEOLAR CREST; PAPILLA; DIMENSIONS; IMMEDIATE; AESTHETICS; MANAGEMENT; LEVEL;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.3981
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the factors affecting facial peri-implant mucosa topography of posterior single implant-supported restorations. Materials and Methods: The cohort comprised 25 patients with a single implant-supported restoration with platform switching and Morse taper-connection implants. Patients were divided into three groups based on facial soft tissue topography. Patients of group A (n = 8), group B (n = 9), and group C (n = 8) had a facial peri-implant tissue margin at the level of, coronal to, and apical to the zenith of the facial gingival margins of the adjacent teeth, respectively. Variables possibly associated with the facial peri-implant tissue margin level were obtained from clinical measurements, periapical radiographs, and cone beam computed tomograms. Results: Implants in group C were placed in a more subcrestal position than implants of group B (1.50 +/- 0.53 mm vs 0.44 +/- 0.88 mm). Implants in group C had their platform in a more apical position in relation to the bone level of the adjacent teeth than implants of group B (3.45 +/- 1.32 mm vs 1.53 +/- 1.17 mm). The horizontal distance between adjacent teeth was greater for group C than for group A and group B (13.53 +/- 2.37 mm vs 10.65 +/- 2.09 mm and 9.82 +/- 1.77 mm, respectively). Conclusion: In this study, facial peri-implant mucosa margins for implants in the posterior region with platform switching and a Morse taper connection were significantly affected by the distances from the implant platform to the buccal aspect of the ridge at the time of implant placement and from the implant platform to the bone level of the adjacent teeth and by the horizontal spaces between the adjacent teeth.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 687
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Belser U, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P73
[2]  
Buser D, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P43
[3]   Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth -: Crown and soft tissue dimensions [J].
Chang, M ;
Wennström, JL ;
Ödman, P ;
Andersson, B .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (03) :185-194
[4]   Soft tissue topography and dimensions lateral to single implant-supported restorations. A cross-sectional study [J].
Chang, Moontaek ;
Wennstrom, Jan L. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (05) :556-562
[5]   Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region [J].
Choquet, V ;
Hermans, M ;
Adriaenssens, P ;
Daelemans, P ;
Tarnow, DP ;
Malevez, C .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (10) :1364-1371
[6]   Predictors of inter-proximal and midfacial recession following single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: a multivariate analysis [J].
Cosyn, Jan ;
Sabzevar, Mehran M. ;
De Bruyn, Hugo .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 39 (09) :895-903
[7]   RADIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF MARGINAL BONE LOSS AT TOOTH SURFACES FACING SINGLE BRANEMARK IMPLANTS [J].
ESPOSITO, M ;
EKESTUBBE, A ;
GRONDAHL, K .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1993, 4 (03) :151-157
[8]   Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements [J].
Evans, Christopher D. J. ;
Chen, Stephen T. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (01) :73-80
[9]   Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns:: the pink esthetic score [J].
Fürhauser, R ;
Florescu, D ;
Benesch, T ;
Haas, R ;
Mailath, G ;
Watzek, G .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (06) :639-644
[10]   Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla [J].
Gastaldo, JF ;
Cury, PR ;
Sendyk, WR .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 75 (09) :1242-1246