The Impact of Software Testing Governance Choices

被引:2
作者
Zhang, Xihui [1 ]
Onita, Colin G. [2 ]
Dhaliwal, Jasbir S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Alabama, Coll Business, Florence, AL 35632 USA
[2] Univ Akron, George Daverio Sch Accountancy, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[3] Univ Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
关键词
Information Technology (IT); IT Governance; IT Managers; Software Development; Software Testing; Software Testing Governance; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT; CONFLICT; BUSINESS; PERFORMANCE; DEVELOPERS; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY;
D O I
10.4018/joeuc.2014010104
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Software testing is becoming a critical component of software development, especially because of the proliferation of complex, interconnected, and real-time business applications. As a result, information technology (IT) managers are struggling with pragmatic governance mechanisms for integrating testing with development. Governance issues pertaining to how software testing is organized at strategic, tactical, and operational levels, however, have not received adequate attention in the literature. This study explores the impact of three specific governance mechanisms, including the existence of a distinct corporate testing unit, developers and testers reporting to different executives, and the existence of one-to-one matching between developers and testers, on the organizational integration of testing with development. A national survey of 196 software development and testing professionals was undertaken to investigate the impact of these governance variables on a set of dependent variables comprising organizational, group, and individual outcomes. The results indicate that these governance mechanisms have significant impacts and need to be considered for successful integration of development and testing.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 85
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STRATEGIES INFORM TE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, P 39 HAW INT C SYST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Board briefing on IT governance, V2nd
[4]  
[Anonymous], AGILE TESTING PRACTC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, P 35 HAW INT C SYST
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, MISQ Executive
[7]  
[Anonymous], P AGILE 2008 TOR CAN
[8]  
[Anonymous], MAL SOFTW TEST BOARD
[9]   Interpersonal conflict and its management in information system development [J].
Barki, H ;
Hartwick, J .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (02) :195-228
[10]  
Callahan J, 2004, STRATEGIES FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GOVERNANCE, P343