Willingness to pay for renewable electricity: A contingent valuation study in Beijing, China

被引:132
作者
Guo, Xiurui [1 ,4 ]
Liu, Haifeng [1 ]
Mao, Xianqiang [2 ]
Jin, Jianjun [3 ]
Chen, Dongsheng [1 ]
Cheng, Shuiyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Environm & Energy Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Resources Sci & Technol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Univ Technol, Key Lab Beijing Reg Air Pollut Control, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
关键词
Contingent valuation method (CVM); Willingness to pay (WTP); Renewable electricity; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; GREEN ELECTRICITY; MECHANISMS; RESPONSES; DESIGN; GOODS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.032
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In China, renewable/green electricity, which can provide significant environmental benefits in addition to meeting energy demand, has more non-use value than use-value for electricity consumers, because its users have no way to actually own this use-value. To assess the value of renewable electricity and obtain information on consumer preferences, this study estimated the willingness to pay (WTP) of Beijing residents for renewable electricity by employing the contingent valuation method (CVM) and identified the factors which affect their WTP. The survey randomly selected 700 participants, of which 571 questionnaires were valid. Half of respondents were found to have positive WTP for renewable electricity. The average WTP of Beijing residents for renewable electricity is estimated to be 2.7-33 US$ (18.5-22.5CNY) per month. The main factors affecting the WTP of the respondents included income, electricity consumption, bid and payment vehicle. Knowledge of and a positive attitude towards renewable energy also resulted in the relatively higher willingness of a respondent to pay for renewable electricity. The proportion of respondents replying "yes" to WTP questions using a mandatory payment vehicle was slightly higher than that for questions using a voluntary vehicle. Lastly, several policy implications of this study are presented. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 347
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   MEASURING VALUES OF EXTRA-MARKET GOODS - ARE INDIRECT MEASURES BIASED [J].
BISHOP, RC ;
HEBERLEIN, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1979, 61 (05) :926-930
[2]  
BMBS (Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics), 2011, BEIJ STAT YB 2010
[3]   Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias [J].
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (04) :383-402
[4]   Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method [J].
Cummings, RG ;
Taylor, LO .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :649-665
[5]   INFERENCE AND OPTIMAL-DESIGN FOR A WELFARE MEASURE IN DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION [J].
DUFFIELD, JW ;
PATTERSON, DA .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1991, 67 (02) :225-239
[6]  
Haab T.C., 2002, ECONOMETRICS NONMARK
[9]   VALUING THE ENVIRONMENT THROUGH CONTINGENT VALUATION [J].
HANEMANN, WM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (04) :19-43
[10]   Consumer willingness-to-pay for biopower: Results from focus groups [J].
Hite, Diane ;
Duffy, Patricia ;
Bransby, David ;
Slaton, Christa .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2008, 32 (01) :11-17