Interpretation in Law I

被引:0
作者
Gaher, Frantisek [1 ]
机构
[1] Filozoficka Fak UK, Katedra Logiky Metodol Vied, Bratislava 81499 1, Slovakia
来源
FILOZOFIA | 2015年 / 70卷 / 08期
关键词
Interpretation; Law; Method; Explication; Logic; Semantics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The author shows what interpretation in law is not and offers a new hypothesis: The interpretation in law is a justified explicatory translation which meets Camap's criteria of an adequate interpretation. He identifies interpretation in law with a set of analytical methods which as such are value-neutral. They are always related to a particular legal system with its value background, and based on a particular philosophy of law. Beside legal erudition it is logical semantics that is an important support of interpretation. The author suggests a reconstruction of legal syllogism which is the methodological subject matter of interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 658
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] BIELIK L., 2015, EXPLIKACIA MET UNPUB
  • [2] Brostl Alexander, 2013, TEORIA PRAVA
  • [3] Carnap R., 1950, Logical foundations of probability
  • [4] CECHAK P., 2015, TEORIE PRAVA INTERPR
  • [5] DWORKIN R, 1982, TEX LAW REV, V60, P527
  • [6] Dworkin R., 2011, JUSTICE HEDGEHOGS
  • [7] GERLOCH A., 2009, TEORIE PRAVA
  • [8] HARTH H. L. A., 2004, POJEM PRAVA
  • [9] Harvanek Jaromir., 2013, PRAVNI TEORIE
  • [10] Hlouch L., 2011, TEORIE REALITA PRAVN