Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain: Power and Sample Size Considerations

被引:181
|
作者
Sideridis, Georgios [1 ]
Simos, Panagiotis [2 ]
Papanicolaou, Andrew [3 ]
Fletcher, Jack [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Crete, Iraklion, Greece
[3] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[4] Univ Houston, Houston, TX USA
关键词
brain connectivity; Monte Carlo simulation; power; RMSEA; structural equation modeling (SEM); OF-FIT INDEXES; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST; STATISTICAL POWER; MONTE-CARLO; TESTS; REGRESSION; ESTIMATOR; VARIABLES; NUMBER; ERROR;
D O I
10.1177/0013164414525397
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The present study assessed the impact of sample size on the power and fit of structural equation modeling applied to functional brain connectivity hypotheses. The data consisted of time-constrained minimum norm estimates of regional brain activity during performance of a reading task obtained with magnetoencephalography. Power analysis was first conducted for an autoregressive model with 5 latent variables (brain regions), each defined by 3 indicators (successive activity time bins). A series of simulations were then run by generating data from an existing pool of 51 typical readers (aged 7.5-12.5 years). Sample sizes ranged between 20 and 1,000 participants and for each sample size 1,000 replications were run. Results were evaluated using chi-square Type I errors, model convergence, mean RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) values, confidence intervals of the RMSEA, structural path stability, and D-Fit index values. Results suggested that 70 to 80 participants were adequate to model relationships reflecting close to not so close fit as per MacCallum et al.'s recommendations. Sample sizes of 50 participants were associated with satisfactory fit. It is concluded that structural equation modeling is a viable methodology to model complex regional interdependencies in brain activation in pediatric populations.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 758
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliable and More Powerful Methods for Power Analysis in Structural Equation Modeling
    Yuan, Ke-Hai
    Zhang, Zhiyong
    Zhao, Yanyun
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2017, 24 (03) : 315 - 330
  • [32] Controlling the false discovery rate in modeling brain functional connectivity
    Li, Junning
    Wang, Z. Jane
    McKeown, Martin J.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1-12, 2008, : 2105 - +
  • [33] Structural Brain Connectivity Constrains within-a-Day Variability of Direct Functional Connectivity
    Park, Bumhee
    Eo, Jinseok
    Park, Hae-Jeong
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11
  • [34] Using structural connectivity to augment community structure in EEG functional connectivity
    Glomb, Katharina
    Mullier, Emeline
    Carboni, Margherita
    Rubega, Maria
    Iannotti, Giannarita
    Tourbier, Sebastien
    Seeber, Martin
    Vulliemoz, Serge
    Hagmann, Patric
    NETWORK NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 4 (03) : 761 - 787
  • [35] Sample size requirements in structural equation models under standard conditions
    Nicolaou, Andreas I.
    Masoner, Michael M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2013, 14 (04) : 256 - 274
  • [36] Power and sample size for multivariate logistic modeling of unmatched case-control studies
    Gail, Mitchell H.
    Haneuse, Sebastien
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (03) : 822 - 834
  • [37] Sample size and power considerations for ordinary least squares interrupted time series analysis: a simulation study
    Hawley, Samuel
    Ali, M. Sanni
    Berencsi, Klara
    Judge, Andrew
    Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 11 : 197 - 205
  • [38] Brain Structural and Functional Connectivity in Parkinson's Disease With Freezing of Gait
    Canu, Elisa
    Agosta, Federica
    Sarasso, Elisabetta
    Volonte, Maria Antonietta
    Basaia, Silvia
    Stojkovic, Tanja
    Stefanova, Elka
    Comi, Giancarlo
    Falini, Andrea
    Kostic, Vladimir S.
    Gatti, Roberto
    Filippi, Massimo
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2015, 36 (12) : 5064 - 5078
  • [39] Estimating power in complex nonlinear structural equation modeling including moderation effects: The powerNLSEM R-package
    Irmer, Julien P.
    Klein, Andreas G.
    Schermelleh-Engel, Karin
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2024, 56 (08) : 8897 - 8931
  • [40] Using the sample range as a basis for calculating sample size in power calculations
    Browne, RH
    AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2001, 55 (04) : 293 - 298