Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain: Power and Sample Size Considerations

被引:181
|
作者
Sideridis, Georgios [1 ]
Simos, Panagiotis [2 ]
Papanicolaou, Andrew [3 ]
Fletcher, Jack [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Crete, Iraklion, Greece
[3] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[4] Univ Houston, Houston, TX USA
关键词
brain connectivity; Monte Carlo simulation; power; RMSEA; structural equation modeling (SEM); OF-FIT INDEXES; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST; STATISTICAL POWER; MONTE-CARLO; TESTS; REGRESSION; ESTIMATOR; VARIABLES; NUMBER; ERROR;
D O I
10.1177/0013164414525397
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The present study assessed the impact of sample size on the power and fit of structural equation modeling applied to functional brain connectivity hypotheses. The data consisted of time-constrained minimum norm estimates of regional brain activity during performance of a reading task obtained with magnetoencephalography. Power analysis was first conducted for an autoregressive model with 5 latent variables (brain regions), each defined by 3 indicators (successive activity time bins). A series of simulations were then run by generating data from an existing pool of 51 typical readers (aged 7.5-12.5 years). Sample sizes ranged between 20 and 1,000 participants and for each sample size 1,000 replications were run. Results were evaluated using chi-square Type I errors, model convergence, mean RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) values, confidence intervals of the RMSEA, structural path stability, and D-Fit index values. Results suggested that 70 to 80 participants were adequate to model relationships reflecting close to not so close fit as per MacCallum et al.'s recommendations. Sample sizes of 50 participants were associated with satisfactory fit. It is concluded that structural equation modeling is a viable methodology to model complex regional interdependencies in brain activation in pediatric populations.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 758
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Considerations on sample size and power calculations in randomized clinical trials
    Karlsson, J
    Engebretsen, L
    Dainty, K
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2003, 19 (09) : 997 - 999
  • [22] Sample size and power considerations in network meta-analysis
    Kristian Thorlund
    Edward J Mills
    Systematic Reviews, 1 (1)
  • [23] Sample size and power considerations in network meta-analysis
    Thorlund, Kristian
    Mills, Edward J.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, 1
  • [24] Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size
    Giner-Sorolla, Roger
    Montoya, Amanda K.
    Reifman, Alan
    Carpenter, Tom
    Lewis Jr, Neil A.
    Aberson, Christopher L.
    Bostyn, Dries H.
    Conrique, Beverly G.
    Ng, Brandon W.
    Schoemann, Alexander M.
    Soderberg, Courtney
    PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2024, 28 (03) : 276 - 301
  • [25] Modeling dynamic characteristics of brain functional connectivity networks using resting-state functional MRI
    Wang, Mingliang
    Huang, Jiashuang
    Liu, Mingxia
    Zhang, Daoqiang
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2021, 71
  • [26] Analyzing the Relationship Between Human Brain Structural and Functional Connectivity Using Kuramoto Model
    Li, Bai
    Chen, Xue
    Yuan, Yue
    Wang, Yanjiang
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICSP), 2018, : 774 - 779
  • [27] Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Online Learning Systems' Educational Sustainability for University Students
    Alismaiel, Omar A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [28] Using structural equation modeling to investigate change and response shift in patient-reported outcomes: practical considerations and recommendations
    Verdam, M. G. E.
    Oort, F. J.
    Sprangers, M. A. G.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (05) : 1293 - 1304
  • [29] Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: A tutorial and Shiny app
    Jak, Suzanne
    Jorgensen, Terrence D.
    Verdam, Mathilde G. E.
    Oort, Frans J.
    Elffers, Louise
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2021, 53 (04) : 1385 - 1406
  • [30] Editorial: It Is a Matter of Matters: Deciphering Structural and Functional Brain Connectivity
    Deshpande, Gopikrishna
    Alluri, Vinoo
    Sharma, Aaryana
    Ingalhalikar, Madhura
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16