Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain: Power and Sample Size Considerations

被引:187
作者
Sideridis, Georgios [1 ]
Simos, Panagiotis [2 ]
Papanicolaou, Andrew [3 ]
Fletcher, Jack [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Crete, Iraklion, Greece
[3] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[4] Univ Houston, Houston, TX USA
关键词
brain connectivity; Monte Carlo simulation; power; RMSEA; structural equation modeling (SEM); OF-FIT INDEXES; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST; STATISTICAL POWER; MONTE-CARLO; TESTS; REGRESSION; ESTIMATOR; VARIABLES; NUMBER; ERROR;
D O I
10.1177/0013164414525397
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The present study assessed the impact of sample size on the power and fit of structural equation modeling applied to functional brain connectivity hypotheses. The data consisted of time-constrained minimum norm estimates of regional brain activity during performance of a reading task obtained with magnetoencephalography. Power analysis was first conducted for an autoregressive model with 5 latent variables (brain regions), each defined by 3 indicators (successive activity time bins). A series of simulations were then run by generating data from an existing pool of 51 typical readers (aged 7.5-12.5 years). Sample sizes ranged between 20 and 1,000 participants and for each sample size 1,000 replications were run. Results were evaluated using chi-square Type I errors, model convergence, mean RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) values, confidence intervals of the RMSEA, structural path stability, and D-Fit index values. Results suggested that 70 to 80 participants were adequate to model relationships reflecting close to not so close fit as per MacCallum et al.'s recommendations. Sample sizes of 50 participants were associated with satisfactory fit. It is concluded that structural equation modeling is a viable methodology to model complex regional interdependencies in brain activation in pediatric populations.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 758
页数:26
相关论文
共 64 条
[31]   Cortical Signatures of Dyslexia and Remediation: An Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Approach [J].
Koyama, Maki S. ;
Di Martino, Adriana ;
Kelly, Clare ;
Jutagir, Devika R. ;
Sunshine, Jessica ;
Schwartz, Susan J. ;
Castellanos, Francisco X. ;
Milham, Michael P. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02)
[32]  
Loehlin JC., 2004, Latent Variable Models : An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Equation Analysis, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781410609823, 10.4324/9781410609823]
[33]   Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling [J].
MacCallum, RC ;
Browne, MW ;
Sugawara, HM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1996, 1 (02) :130-149
[34]   Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI [J].
MacCallum, RC ;
Hong, S .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1997, 32 (02) :193-210
[35]   The Issue of Isopower in Power Analysis for Tests of Structural Equation Models [J].
MacCallum, Robert ;
Lee, Taehun ;
Browne, Michael W. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2010, 17 (01) :23-41
[36]  
Marcoulides G.A., 1989, J BUSINESS SOC, V2, P130
[38]  
Marcoulides GA, 2006, MIS QUART, V30, pIII
[39]   GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDEXES IN CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS - THE EFFECT OF SAMPLE-SIZE [J].
MARSH, HW ;
BALLA, JR ;
MCDONALD, RP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :391-410
[40]   Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis [J].
Marsh, HW ;
Hau, KT ;
Balla, JR ;
Grayson, D .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1998, 33 (02) :181-220