Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain: Power and Sample Size Considerations

被引:187
作者
Sideridis, Georgios [1 ]
Simos, Panagiotis [2 ]
Papanicolaou, Andrew [3 ]
Fletcher, Jack [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Crete, Iraklion, Greece
[3] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[4] Univ Houston, Houston, TX USA
关键词
brain connectivity; Monte Carlo simulation; power; RMSEA; structural equation modeling (SEM); OF-FIT INDEXES; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST; STATISTICAL POWER; MONTE-CARLO; TESTS; REGRESSION; ESTIMATOR; VARIABLES; NUMBER; ERROR;
D O I
10.1177/0013164414525397
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The present study assessed the impact of sample size on the power and fit of structural equation modeling applied to functional brain connectivity hypotheses. The data consisted of time-constrained minimum norm estimates of regional brain activity during performance of a reading task obtained with magnetoencephalography. Power analysis was first conducted for an autoregressive model with 5 latent variables (brain regions), each defined by 3 indicators (successive activity time bins). A series of simulations were then run by generating data from an existing pool of 51 typical readers (aged 7.5-12.5 years). Sample sizes ranged between 20 and 1,000 participants and for each sample size 1,000 replications were run. Results were evaluated using chi-square Type I errors, model convergence, mean RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) values, confidence intervals of the RMSEA, structural path stability, and D-Fit index values. Results suggested that 70 to 80 participants were adequate to model relationships reflecting close to not so close fit as per MacCallum et al.'s recommendations. Sample sizes of 50 participants were associated with satisfactory fit. It is concluded that structural equation modeling is a viable methodology to model complex regional interdependencies in brain activation in pediatric populations.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 758
页数:26
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN FACTOR ANALYSIS [J].
Bartlett, M. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-STATISTICAL SECTION, 1950, 3 :77-85
[2]   PRACTICAL ISSUES IN STRUCTURAL MODELING [J].
BENTLER, PM ;
CHOU, CP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1987, 16 (01) :78-117
[3]   An alternative two stage least squares (2SLS) estimator for latent variable equations [J].
Bollen, KA .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1996, 61 (01) :109-121
[4]   Autoregressive latent trajectory (ALT) models a synthesis of two traditions [J].
Bollen, KA ;
Curran, PJ .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2004, 32 (03) :336-383
[5]  
Boomsma A., 1982, Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction, P149
[6]  
Breivik E., 2001, Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future: A Festschrift in Honour of Karl Joreskog, P169
[7]  
Browne M. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[8]   Vector autoregression, structural equation modeling, and their synthesis in neuroimaging data analysis [J].
Chen, Gang ;
Glen, Daniel R. ;
Saad, Ziad S. ;
Hamilton, J. Paul ;
Thomason, Moriah E. ;
Gotlib, Ian H. ;
Cox, Robert W. .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2011, 41 (12) :1142-1155
[9]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255
[10]  
Chin W. W., 1999, Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, V1, P307