The ecosystem approach as a framework for understanding knowledge utilisation

被引:31
|
作者
Haines-Young, Roy [1 ]
Potschin, Marion [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Ctr Environm Management, Sch Geog, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY | 2014年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
ecosystem approach; knowledge utilisation and innovation; environmental decision making; deliberative processes; conflict resolution; ecosystem knowledge; DECISION-MAKING; SERVICES; PERSPECTIVES; EXPERIENCES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1068/c1329j
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ecosystem approach is used to analyse four case studies from England to determine what kind of ecosystem knowledge was used by people, and how it shaped their arguments. The results are reported across decision-making venues concerned with: innovation, conflict management, maintenance of ecosystem function, and recognising the environment as an asset. In each area we identify the sources and uses of conceptual, instrumental, political, and social knowledge. We found that the use of these knowledges can benefit the process as well as the quality of outcomes, and so `add value' to the decision- making process. However, the case studies did not exhibit any simple linearrational model of knowledge use. Ecosystems thinking took many forms and depended on different institutional settings. As an argument-making device, the ecosystem approach must be seen in the context of a wider set of social and political processes, which involves a range of complex strategies and motives that explain the apparent `messiness' of environmental decision making. The paper demonstrates that as a conceptual framework, the ecosystem approach provides a valuable theoretical template to help us discover how and what knowledge is used in deliberative styles of decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 319
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The challenge of embedding an ecosystem services approach: patterns of knowledge utilisation in public policy appraisal
    Turnpenny, John
    Russel, Duncan
    Jordan, Andrew
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2014, 32 (02): : 247 - 262
  • [2] Critical assessment of the current understanding/knowledge of the framework of the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries in the Mediterranean and Black Seas
    Sartor, Paolo
    Colloca, Francesco
    Maravelias, Christos
    Maynou, Francesc
    SCIENTIA MARINA, 2014, 78 : 19 - 27
  • [3] Embedding the concept of ecosystem services? The utilisation of ecological knowledge in different policy venues
    Jordan, Andrew
    Russel, Duncan
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2014, 32 (02): : 192 - 207
  • [4] The utilisation of environmental knowledge in landuse planning: drawing lessons for an ecosystem services approach
    Cowell, Richard
    Lennon, Mick
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2014, 32 (02): : 263 - 282
  • [5] Framework for understanding marine ecosystem health
    Tett, P.
    Gowen, R. J.
    Painting, S. J.
    Elliott, M.
    Forster, R.
    Mills, D. K.
    Bresnan, E.
    Capuzzo, E.
    Fernandes, T. F.
    Foden, J.
    Geider, R. J.
    Gilpin, L. C.
    Huxham, M.
    McQuatters-Gollop, A. L.
    Malcolm, S. J.
    Saux-Picart, S.
    Platt, T.
    Racault, M. -F.
    Sathyendranath, S.
    van der Molen, J.
    Wilkinson, M.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2013, 494 : 1 - 27
  • [6] Knowledge Translation in Rehabilitation Engineering Research and Development: A Knowledge Ecosystem Framework
    Chau, Tom
    Moghimi, Saba
    Popovic, Milos R.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 94 (01): : S9 - S19
  • [7] Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
    Saarikoski, Heli
    Primmer, Eeva
    Saarela, Sanna-Riikka
    Antunes, Paula
    Aszalos, Reka
    Baro, Francesc
    Berry, Pam
    Garcia Blanko, Gemma
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    Carvalho, Laurence
    Dick, Jan
    Dunford, Robert
    Hanzu, Mihail
    Harrison, Paula A.
    Izakovicova, Zita
    Kertesz, Miklos
    Kopperoinen, Leena
    Kohler, Berit
    Langemeyer, Johannes
    Lapola, David
    Liquete, Camino
    Luque, Sandra
    Mederly, Peter
    Niemela, Jari
    Palomo, Ignacio
    Martinez Pastur, Guillermo
    Luis Peri, Pablo
    Preda, Elena
    Priess, Joerg A.
    Santos, Rui
    Schleyer, Christian
    Turkelboom, Francis
    Vadineanu, Angheluta
    Verheyden, Wim
    Vikstrom, Suvi
    Young, Juliette
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 29 : 579 - 598
  • [8] A comparative framework to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries in a global context
    Lockerbie, Emma M.
    Shannon, Lynne
    Lynam, Christopher P.
    Coll, Marta
    Jarre, Astrid
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2020, 25 (02): : 1 - 19
  • [9] Policy impacts of ecosystem services knowledge
    Posner, Stephen M.
    McKenzie, Emily
    Ricketts, Taylor H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (07) : 1760 - 1765
  • [10] A conceptual framework for understanding ecosystem trade-offs and synergies, in communal rangeland systems
    Bennett, James
    Marandure, Tawanda
    Hawkins, Heidi-Jayne
    Mapiye, Cletos
    Palmer, Anthony
    Lemke, Stefanie
    Wu, Lianhai
    Moradzadeh, Mostafa
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 61