Analysis of bioretention cell design elements based on Fourier amplitude sensitivity test(FAST)

被引:7
作者
Wang, Hongwu [1 ]
Mao, Yunfeng [1 ]
Gao, Yuan [2 ]
Fan, Jinhong [1 ]
Zhang, Shanfa [2 ]
Ma, Luming [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Natl Engn Res Ctr Urban Pollut Control, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Urban Construct & Design Res Inst, Shanghai 200125, Peoples R China
来源
MATERIALS, TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2013年 / 779-780卷
关键词
Global sensitivity analysis; bioretention cell; design elements; FAST; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.779-780.1369
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sensitivity analysis of bioretention cell design elements can provide a theoretical basis for the design and construction of a bioretention cell. This study uses the storm management model (SWMM) and the bioretention infiltration RECARGA to generate runoff and outflow time series for calculation of hydrologic performance metrics. The hydrologic performance metrics include: the overflow ratio, groundwater recharge ratio, ponding time and underdrain flow ratio. The FAST method is chose to analyze sensitivity of design elements for two types of bioretention cell, one without underdrain and the other with underdrain. The results show that the surface area is the most sensitivity to most the hydrologic metrics for both types of bioretention, while the planting soil depth and the gravel depth are the two least sensitive elements. The saturated infiltration rates of planting soil and native soil are another two sensitive elements for bioretention cells without underdrain, but the saturated infiltration rate of planting soil and underdrain size are another two sensitive design elements for bioretention cells with underdrain.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Performance Assessment of Rain Gardens1
    Asleson, Brooke C.
    Nestingen, Rebecca S.
    Gulliver, John S.
    Hozalski, Raymond M.
    Nieber, John L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2009, 45 (04): : 1019 - 1031
  • [2] Beven K.J., 1993, ADV WATER RESSOURCES, V16, P41
  • [3] Chan K., 1997, WINT SIM C, P261
  • [4] NON-LINEAR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF MULTI-PARAMETER MODEL SYSTEMS
    CUKIER, RI
    LEVINE, HB
    SHULER, KE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1978, 26 (01) : 1 - 42
  • [5] STUDY OF SENSITIVITY OF COUPLED REACTION SYSTEMS TO UNCERTAINTIES IN RATE COEFFICIENTS .3. ANALYSIS OF APPROXIMATIONS
    CUKIER, RI
    SCHAIBLY, JH
    SHULER, KE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1975, 63 (03) : 1140 - 1149
  • [6] Huber W., 1987, STORM WATER MANAGEME
  • [7] Sensitivity analysis of a complex, proposed geologic waste disposal system using the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test method
    Lu, YC
    Mohanty, S
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 72 (03) : 275 - 291
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR SELECTING VALUES OF INPUT VARIABLES IN THE ANALYSIS OF OUTPUT FROM A COMPUTER CODE
    MCKAY, MD
    BECKMAN, RJ
    CONOVER, WJ
    [J]. TECHNOMETRICS, 1979, 21 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [9] Michael E, 2005, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V167, P123
  • [10] Global analysis of sensitivity of bioretention cell design elements to hydrologic performance
    Sun, Yan-Wei
    Wei, Xiao-Mei
    Pomeroy, Christine A.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2011, 4 (03) : 246 - 257