Downside risk and portfolio diversification in the euro-zone equity markets with special consideration of the crisis period

被引:5
作者
Liu, Tengdong [1 ]
Hammoudeh, Shawkat [2 ]
Santos, Paulo Araujo [3 ]
机构
[1] SWUFE, Sch Secur & Futures, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Drexel Univ, Lebow Coll Business, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Stat & Applicat, Sch Management & Technol Santarem, Santarem, Portugal
关键词
Value at risk; Euro-zone equity markets; Augmented portfolios; Subperiods; VALUE-AT-RISK; INDUSTRY; COUNTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.01.006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the Value-at-Risk for ten euro-zone equity markets individually and also divided into two groups: PIIGS (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain) and the Core (Austria, Finland, France, Germany and the Netherlands), employing four VaR estimation and evaluation methods considered over the full period and the pre- and post-global crisis subperiods 1 and 2. The backtesting results are also evaluated according to the Basel capital requirements. The results demonstrate that the CEVT methods meet all the statistical criteria the best for most individual equity indices over the full period, but these results over the two subperiods for those two methods are mixed, compared to those the DPOT methods. Moreover, the two optimal group portfolios of the PIIGS and the Core as well as the grand portfolio that combines the ten indices do not show much diversification benefits. The PIIGS portfolio selects Spain's IBEX only, while that of the Core opts for Austria's ATX only in the full period and subperiod 1. However, Germany's DAX overwhelmingly dominates both the Core and the Grand portfolios in subperiod 2. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 68
页数:22
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Adjaout K., 2004, Applied Financial Economics, V14, P1225
  • [2] Adjaoute K., 2001, 2962 CEPR
  • [3] Adjaoute K., 2002, The Transformation of the European Financial System, P185
  • [4] Allen D. E, 2005, SIAM INT C MOD SIM S
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [6] Forecasting Value-at-Risk with a duration-based POT method
    Araujo Santos, P.
    Fraga Alves, M. I.
    [J]. MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2013, 94 : 295 - 309
  • [7] A new class of independence tests for interval forecasts evaluation
    Araujo Santos, P.
    Fraga Alves, M. I.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2012, 56 (11) : 3366 - 3380
  • [8] Value-at-risk-based risk management: Optimal policies and asset prices
    Basak, S
    Shapiro, A
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2001, 14 (02) : 371 - 405
  • [9] Billio M., 2000, J EMPIR FINANC, V7, P531, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0927-5398(00)00022-0, 10.1016/S0927-5398(00)00022-0]
  • [10] Optimal portfolio selection in a Value-at-Risk framework
    Campbell, R
    Huisman, R
    Koedijk, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2001, 25 (09) : 1789 - 1804