Application of machine learning to microseismic event detection in distributed acoustic sensing data

被引:52
作者
Stork, Anna L. [1 ,2 ]
Baird, Alan F. [1 ]
Horne, Steve A. [3 ]
Naldrett, Garth [2 ]
Lapins, Sacha [1 ]
Kendall, J-Michael [1 ,4 ]
Wookey, James [1 ]
Verdon, James P. [1 ]
Clarke, Andy [2 ]
Williams, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Earth Sci, Queens Rd, Bristol BS8 1RJ, Avon, England
[2] Silixa Ltd, 230 Centennial Ave, Elstree WD6 3SN, Borehamwood, England
[3] Chevron Energy Technol Co, 1 Westferry Circus, London E14 4HA, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Dept Earth Sci, 3 S Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3AN, England
关键词
CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2019-0774.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This study presents the first demonstration of the transferability of a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained to detect microseismic events in one fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) data set to other data sets. DAS increasingly is being used for microseismic monitoring in industrial settings, and the dense spatial and temporal sampling provided by these systems produces large data volumes (approximately 650 GB/day for a 2 km long cable sampling at 2000 Hz with a spatial sampling of 1 m), requiring new processing techniques for near-real-time microseismic analysis. We have trained the CNN known as YOLOv3, an object detection algorithm, to detect microseismic events using synthetically generated waveforms with real noise superimposed. The performance of the CNN network is compared to the number of events detected using filtering and amplitude threshold (short-term average/long-term average) detection techniques. In the data set from which the real noise is taken, the network is able to detect >80% of the events identified by manual inspection and 14% more than detected by standard frequency-wavenumber filtering techniques. The false detection rate is approximately 2% or one event every 20 s. In other data sets, with monitoring geometries and conditions previously unseen by the network, >50% of events identified by manual inspection are detected by the CNN.
引用
收藏
页码:KS149 / KS160
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] ALLEN RV, 1978, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V68, P1521
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, DARKNET
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, IMAGENET
  • [4] Baird AF, 2020, GEOPHYSICS, V85, pKS139, DOI [10.1190/geo2019-0776.1, 10.1190/GEO2019-0776.1]
  • [5] Beresnev IA, 1997, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V87, P67
  • [6] Binder G., 2019, SEG TECHN PROGR EXP, P4864, DOI [DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2019-3214863.1, 10.1190/segam2019-3214863.1]
  • [7] Testing the ability of surface arrays to monitor microseismic activity
    Chambers, Kit
    Kendall, J. -Michael
    Brandsberg-Dahl, Sverre
    Rueda, Jose
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2010, 58 (05) : 817 - 826
  • [8] Chapman C., 2004, Fundamentals of Seismic Wave Propagation
  • [9] Real-Time Imaging, Forecasting, and Management of Human-Induced Seismicity at Preston New Road, Lancashire, England
    Clarke, Huw
    Verdon, James P.
    Kettlety, Tom
    Baird, Alan F.
    Kendall, J-Michael
    [J]. SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 90 (05) : 1902 - 1915
  • [10] Cole S., 2018, SOURCE PARAMETER EST, P4928, DOI DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2018-2995716.1