Implementation science in maternity care: a scoping review

被引:38
作者
Dadich, Ann [1 ]
Piper, Annika [1 ]
Coates, Dominiek [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Business, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, POB 123, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Maternity care; Pregnancy; Childbirth; Scoping review; Knowledge translation; Theory; Model; Framework; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE; MIDWIFERY HEALTH-SERVICES; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; REALIST EVALUATION; PROFESSIONALS VIEWS; CESAREAN-SECTION; PREGNANT-WOMEN; CENTERED CARE; 10; STEPS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-021-01083-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Despite wide recognition that clinical care should be informed by the best available evidence, this does not always occur. Despite a myriad of theories, models and frameworks to promote evidence-based population health, there is still a long way to go, particularly in maternity care. The aim of this study is to appraise the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of evidence-based interventions in maternity care. This is achieved by clarifying if and how implementation science theories, models, and frameworks are used. Methods To map relevant literature, a scoping review was conducted of articles published between January 2005 and December 2019, guided by Peters and colleagues' (2015) approach. Specifically, the following academic databases were systematically searched to identify publications that presented findings on implementation science or the implementation process (rather than just the intervention effect): Business Source Complete; CINAHL Plus with Full Text; Health Business Elite; Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition; Medline; PsycARTICLES; PsycINFO; and PubMed. Information about each study was extracted using a purposely designed data extraction form. Results Of the 1181 publications identified, 158 were included in this review. Most of these reported on factors that enabled implementation, including knowledge, training, service provider motivation, effective multilevel coordination, leadership and effective communication-yet there was limited expressed use of a theory, model or framework to guide implementation. Of the 158 publications, 144 solely reported on factors that helped and/or hindered implementation, while only 14 reported the use of a theory, model and/or framework. When a theory, model or framework was used, it typically guided data analysis or, to a lesser extent, the development of data collection tools-rather than for instance, the design of the study. Conclusion Given that models and frameworks can help to describe phenomenon, and theories can help to both describe and explain it, evidence-based maternity care might be promoted via the greater expressed use of these to ultimately inform implementation science. Specifically, advancing evidence-based maternity care, worldwide, will require the academic community to make greater explicit and judicious use of theories, models, and frameworks. Registration Registered with the Joanna Briggs Institute (registration number not provided).
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 211 条
  • [1] Analyzing barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an action plan to strengthen the midwifery professional role: a Moroccan case study
    Abou-Malham, Sabina
    Hatem, Marie
    Leduc, Nicole
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [2] Competing Values Framework: A useful tool to define the predominant culture in a maternity setting in Australia
    Adams, Catherine
    Dawson, Angela
    Foureur, Maralyn
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2017, 30 (02) : 107 - 113
  • [3] Developing evidence-based maternity care in Iran: A quality improvement study
    Aghlmand S.
    Akbari F.
    Lameei A.
    Mohammad K.
    Small R.
    Arab M.
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 8 (1)
  • [4] Lost opportunities to identify and treat HIV-positive patients: results from a baseline assessment of provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) in Malawi
    Ahmed, Saeed
    Schwarz, Monica
    Flick, Robert J.
    Rees, Chris A.
    Harawa, Mwelura
    Simon, Katie
    Robison, Jeff A.
    Kazembe, Peter N.
    Kim, Maria H.
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2016, 21 (04) : 479 - 485
  • [5] Breastfeeding Practices and Barriers to Implementing the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding in Mississippi Hospitals
    Alakaam, Amir
    Lemacks, Jennifer
    Yadrick, Kathleen
    Connell, Carol
    Choi, Hwanseok Winston
    Newman, Ray G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN LACTATION, 2018, 34 (02) : 322 - 330
  • [6] Attitudes towards the implementation of universal umbilical artery lactate analysis in a South African district hospital
    Allanson, Emma R.
    Grobicki, Kate
    Pattinson, Robert C.
    Dickinson, Jan E.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [7] Maternity-ward nurses' kangaroo mother care attitudes and practices: implications and future challenges
    Almazan, Joseph U.
    Cruz, Jonas P.
    Albougami, Abdulrhman S.
    Alamri, Majed S.
    Adolfo, Cris S.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2019, 33 (04) : 848 - 856
  • [8] Survey of Australian maternity hospitals to inform development and implementation of a stillbirth prevention 'bundle of care'
    Andrews, C. J.
    Ellwood, D.
    Middleton, P. F.
    Homer, C. S. E.
    Reinebrant, H. E.
    Donnolley, N.
    Boyle, F. M.
    Gordon, A.
    Nicholl, M.
    Morris, J.
    Gardener, G.
    Davies-Tuck, M.
    Wallace, E. M.
    Flenady, V. J.
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2020, 33 (03) : 251 - 258
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2018, Economic inclusion of LGBTI Groups in Thailand, DOI DOI 10.1596/29632
  • [10] 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review
    Armstrong, Rebecca
    Hall, Belinda J.
    Doyle, Jodie
    Waters, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 33 (01) : 147 - 150