Eighteen Months of Treatment With Subcutaneous Abaloparatide Followed by 6 Months of Treatment With Alendronate in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: Results of the ACTIVExtend Trial

被引:94
作者
Cosman, Felicia [1 ,2 ]
Miller, Paul D. [3 ]
Williams, Gregory C. [4 ]
Hattersley, Gary [4 ]
Hu, Ming-yi [4 ]
Valter, Ivo [5 ]
Fitzpatrick, Lorraine A. [4 ]
Riis, Bente Juel [6 ]
Christiansen, Claus [6 ]
Bilezikian, John P. [7 ]
Black, Dennis [8 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Clin Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Helen Hayes Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, 51-55 Route 9W North, W Haverstraw, NY 10093 USA
[3] Colorado Ctr Bone Res, Lakewood, CO USA
[4] Radius Hlth Inc, Waltham, MA USA
[5] Ctr Clin & Basic Res, Tallinn, Estonia
[6] Nord Biosci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Univ Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
PARATHYROID-HORMONE; 1-34; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; VERTEBRAL FRACTURE; ZOLEDRONIC ACID; HIP FRACTURE; TERIPARATIDE; RISK; EXTENSION; DENOSUMAB; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective:<bold> </bold>To assess the efficacy and safety of 18 months of subcutaneous abaloparatide (ABL-SC) or placebo (PBO) followed by 6 months of alendronate (ALN) (preplanned interim analysis). Patients and Methods:<bold> </bold>ACTIVExtend, an extension of ACTIVE, enrolled patients who completed 18 months of ABL-SC or PBO in ACTIVE to receive up to 24 additional months of open-label ALN; there was 1 month between the studies to re-consent patients. Results:<bold> </bold>Of 1243 eligible ACTIVE patients, 1139 (92%) were enrolled in ACTIVExtend beginning November 20, 2012. These results are from a prespecified 6-month interim analysis (cutoff date, June 2, 2015); the study is ongoing. Findings indicated percentages of patients with new morphometric vertebral fractures: PBO/ALN, 4.4% vs ABL-SC/ALN, 0.55%; relative risk reduction, 87% (relative risk, 0.13; 95%CI, 0.04-0.41;P <.001). Kaplan-Meier estimated rates of nonvertebral fractures were PBO/ALN, 5.6% vs ABL-SC/ALN, 2.7%; risk reduction, 52% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95%CI, 0.26-0.89; log-rank P=.02). There was also a 58% risk reduction of major osteoporotic fractures (HR, 0.42; 95%CI, 0.21-0.85; log-rank P=.01) and a 45% risk reduction of clinical fractures (HR, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.33-0.92; log-rank P=.02) in the ABL-SC/ALN group vs the PBO/ALN group. At 25 months, bone mineral density percentage change from ACTIVE baseline for ABL-SC/ALN vs PBO/ALN was as follows: lumbar spine, 12.8%; total hip, 5.5%; femoral neck, 4.5% vs 3.5%, 1.4%, 0.5%, respectively (group differences at all sites P<.001). Conclusion:<bold> </bold>Use of ABL-SC for 18 months followed by ALN for 6 months improved bone mineral density and reduced fracture risk throughout the skeleton and may be an effective treatment option for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. (C) 2016 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 210
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [31] Obaidi M, 2010, AM ASS PHARM SCI AAP
  • [32] The effect of 8 or 5 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM Extension study
    Papapoulos, S.
    Lippuner, K.
    Roux, C.
    Lin, C. J. F.
    Kendler, D. L.
    Lewiecki, E. M.
    Brandi, M. L.
    Czerwinski, E.
    Franek, E.
    Lakatos, P.
    Mautalen, C.
    Minisola, S.
    Reginster, J. Y.
    Jensen, S.
    Daizadeh, N. S.
    Wang, A.
    Gavin, M.
    Libanati, C.
    Wagman, R. B.
    Bone, H. G.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 26 (12) : 2773 - 2783
  • [33] Rosen CJ., 2013, Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism, V8th
  • [34] Ryg J, 2009, J BONE MINER RES, V24, P1299, DOI [10.1359/JBMR.090207, 10.1359/jbmr.090207]
  • [35] Association between prior non-spine non-hip fractures or prevalent radiographic vertebral deformities known to be at least 10 years old and incident hip fracture
    Schousboe, John T.
    Fink, Howard A.
    Lui, Li-Yung
    Taylor, Brent C.
    Ensrud, Kristine E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2006, 21 (10) : 1557 - 1564
  • [36] Timing of subsequent fractures after an initial fracture
    Van Geel T.A.C.M.
    Huntjens K.M.B.
    Van Den Bergh J.P.W.
    Dinant G.-J.
    Geusens P.P.
    [J]. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2010, 8 (3) : 118 - 122