Greenhouse and field evaluation of the novel herbicide QYC101 for weed control in maize (Zea mays L.) in China

被引:14
作者
Wang, Hengzhi [1 ]
Huang, Yizhao [1 ]
Zhao, Kongping [1 ]
Liu, Weitang [1 ]
Wang, Jinxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Agr Univ, Coll Plant Protect, Tai An 271018, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
New HPPD-Inhibiting herbicide; Weed control; Maize; QYC101; INHIBITING HERBICIDES; RESISTANT; MESOTRIONE; TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cropro.2019.04.012
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A novel 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibiting herbicide, 4-(2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-3-((2,2,2- trifluoroethoxy) methyl) benzoyl)-1-ethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-yl 1,3-dimethyl-1H- pyrazole-4-carboxylate (QYC101), was evaluated under greenhouse and field conditions in China to determine its efficacy against weeds and safety towards maize via post-emergence (POST) applications. In the greenhouse experiment, QYC101 application at 15 g a.i. ha(-1) was highly effective (>80% dry weight reduction) at controlling some major weed species present in maize production systems in China such as Solarium nigrum L., Amaranthus retrofiexus L., Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb.) Schreb. ex Muhl., Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv., Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv. and Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. The tolerance results revealed that 22 of the tested maize hybrids displayed different levels of tolerance to QYC101 application at 90 and 180 g a.i. ha(-1) . The results obtained from the field experiments in 2016 and 2017 showed that QYC101 applications at 45, 67.5, 90 and 135 g a.i. ha(-1) provided an 88.7-97.4% weed biomass reduction and a 10.1-22.2% yield increase in maize fields. These results indicate that QYC101 has great potential for weed management in maize production systems in China.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Almsick A. van, 2009, Outlooks on Pest Management, V20, P27, DOI 10.1564/20feb09
[2]   Mesotrione alone and in mixtures with glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays) [J].
Armel, GR ;
Wilson, HR ;
Richardson, RJ ;
Hines, TE .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 17 (04) :680-685
[3]  
Baghestani-Maybodi M. A., 2005, Iranian Journal of Weed Science, V1, P111
[4]  
Bartley M, 1993, ASSESSMENT HERBICIDE, P57
[5]   Our top 10 herbicide-resistant weed management practices [J].
Beckie, Hugh J. ;
Harker, K. Neil .
PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 73 (06) :1045-1052
[6]  
Boger P., 1998, Pesticide Outlook, V9, P29
[7]   Efficacy and Tolerance to HPPD-Inhibiting Herbicides in Sweet Corn [J].
Bollman, Joseph D. ;
Boerboom, Chris M. ;
Becker, Roger L. ;
Fritz, Vince A. .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 22 (04) :666-674
[8]  
China Pesticide Information Network, 2008, REG DAT
[9]  
Cui L. N., 2017, J ANHUI AGR SCI, V45, P22
[10]  
Dai H. P., 2018, ANHUI AGR SCI B, V24, P35