Active Surveillance for Men with Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:18
作者
Agrawal, Vishesh [1 ]
Ma, Xiaoyue [2 ]
Hu, Jim C. [3 ]
Barbieri, Christopher E. [3 ]
Nagar, Himanshu [1 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med, Div Biostat & Epidemiol, Dept Healthcare Policy & Res, New York, NY USA
[3] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
关键词
watchful waiting; prostatic neoplasms; risk; FOLLOW-UP; CLASSIFICATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000001241
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Optimal treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer remains unclear. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (R) guidelines recommend active surveillance, prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Recent trials demonstrated no difference in prostate cancer specific mortality for men undergoing active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer compared to prostatectomy or radiotherapy. The use of active surveillance for intermediate risk prostate cancer is less clear. In this study we characterize U.S. national trends for demographic, clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with active surveillance for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined 176,122 men diagnosed with intermediate risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016 in the National Cancer Database. Temporal trends in demographic, clinical and socioeconomic factors among men with intermediate risk prostate cancer and association with the use of active surveillance were characterized. The analysis was performed in April 2020. Results: In total, 176,122 men were identified with intermediate risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016. Of these men 57.3% underwent prostatectomy, 36.4% underwent radiotherapy and 3.2% underwent active surveillance. Active surveillance nearly tripled from 1.6% in 2010 to 4.6% in 2016 (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis use of active surveillance was associated with older age, diagnosis in recent years, lower Gleason score and tumor stage, type of insurance, treatment at an academic center and proximity to facility, and attaining higher education (p<0.05). Race and comorbidities were not associated with active surveillance. Conclusions: Our findings highlight increasing active surveillance use for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer demonstrating clinical and socioeconomic disparities. Prospective data and improved risk stratification are needed to guide optimal treatment for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 121
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Active Surveillance for Black Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in the United States [J].
Al Awamlh, Bashir Al Hussein ;
Hu, Jim C. ;
Shoag, Jonathan E. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (26) :2581-2582
[2]   Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer [J].
Bul, Meelan ;
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. ;
Zhu, Xiaoye ;
Rannikko, Antti ;
Vasarainen, Hanna ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Schroder, Fritz H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11) :1672-1677
[3]   Defining Prostate Cancer at Favorable Intermediate Risk: The Potential Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Genomic Tests [J].
Falagario, Ugo G. ;
Beksac, Alp Tuna ;
Martini, Alberto ;
Cumarasamy, Shivaram ;
Gupta, Akriti ;
Prasad, Sonya ;
Thulasidass, Hari ;
Shah, Qainat N. ;
Jayaratna, Isuru ;
Lewis, Sara ;
Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. ;
Taouli, Bachir ;
Cormio, Luigi ;
Carrieri, Giuseppe ;
Tewari, Ash K. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (01) :102-106
[4]   Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3+4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance [J].
Gearman, Derek J. ;
Morlacco, Alessandro ;
Cheville, John C. ;
Rangel, Laureano J. ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (05) :1188-1195
[5]   10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer [J].
Hamdy, F. C. ;
Donovan, J. L. ;
Lane, J. A. ;
Mason, M. ;
Metcalfe, C. ;
Holding, P. ;
Davis, M. ;
Peters, T. J. ;
Turner, E. L. ;
Martin, R. M. ;
Oxley, J. ;
Robinson, M. ;
Staffurth, J. ;
Walsh, E. ;
Bollina, P. ;
Catto, J. ;
Doble, A. ;
Doherty, A. ;
Gillatt, D. ;
Kockelbergh, R. ;
Kynaston, H. ;
Paul, A. ;
Powell, P. ;
Prescott, S. ;
Rosario, D. J. ;
Rowe, E. ;
Neal, D. E. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (15) :1415-1424
[6]   Large cribriform growth pattern identifies ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence and metastasis [J].
Hollemans, Eva ;
Verhoef, Esther I. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Rietbergen, John ;
Helleman, Jozien ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32 (01) :139-146
[7]   Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large Active Surveillance Cohort of Patients With Prostate Cancer [J].
Klotz, Laurence ;
Vesprini, Danny ;
Sethukavalan, Perakaa ;
Jethava, Vibhuti ;
Zhang, Liying ;
Jain, Suneil ;
Yamamoto, Toshihiro ;
Mamedov, Alexandre ;
Loblaw, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (03) :272-U75
[8]   Population Based Study of Use and Determinants of Active Surveillance and Watchful Waiting for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Loeb, Stacy ;
Berglund, Anders ;
Stattin, Par .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (05) :1742-1749
[9]   Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer [J].
Masic, Selma ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Washington, Samuel L. ;
Nguyen, Hao G. ;
Shinohara, Katsuto ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (05) :386-394
[10]   Trends in active surveillance for very low-risk prostate cancer: do guidelines influence modern practice? [J].
Parikh, Rahul R. ;
Kim, Sinae ;
Stein, Mark N. ;
Haffty, Bruce G. ;
Kim, Isaac Y. ;
Goyal, Sharad .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2017, 6 (10) :2410-2418