Inhaled Nitric Oxide: In Vitro Analysis of Continuous Flow Noninvasive Delivery via Nasal Cannula

被引:2
作者
Pillay, Kineshta [1 ]
Chen, John Z. [1 ]
Finlay, Warren H. [1 ]
Martin, Andrew R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
inhaled nitric oxide; constant flow; airway model; nasal cannula; tracheal concentration; mass flow; dose; efficiency; OXYGEN; AIRWAYS;
D O I
10.4187/respcare.07737
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) is most frequently delivered to mechanically ventilated patients in critical care, but it can also be administered noninvasively. The delivered dose and efficiency of continuous flow NO supplied through a nasal cannula has yet to be established. This study aimed to determine the influence of nasal cannula type, supply flow, and breathing pattern on delivered NO using a realistic adult airway replica and lung simulator. METHODS: Simulated breathing patterns were selected to represent rest, sleep, and light exercise, and were varied to investigate the effects of tidal volume and breathing frequency independently. Supplied gas flows targeted tracheal concentrations at rest of 5 or 20 ppm NO and were supplied with 2 L/min O-2. Three different cannulas were tested. Tracheal NO concentrations and NO mass flow past the trachea were evaluated. RESULTS: Cannula type had a minor influence on delivered dose. Tracheal NO concentrations differed significantly based on breathing pattern (P < 0.01); for a target NO concentration of 20 ppm at rest, average inhaled NO concentrations were 23.3 +/- 0.5 ppm, 36.5 +/- 1.4 ppm, and 17.2 +/- 0.3 ppm for the rest, sleep, and light exercise breathing patterns, respectively. For the same test conditions, mass flow of NO past the trachea was less sensitive to breathing pattern: 20.3 +/- 0.5 mg/h, 19.9 +/- 0.8 mg/h, and 24.3 +/- 0.4 mg/h for the rest, sleep, and light exercise breathing patterns, respectively. Mass flow and delivery efficiency increased when minute volume increased. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that inhaled NO concentration is strongly influenced by breathing pattern, whereas inhaled NO mass flow is not. NO mass flow may therefore be a useful dose metric for continuous flow delivery via nasal cannula.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 239
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Abman SH, 2013, HANDB EXP PHARMACOL, V218, P257, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-38664-0_11
  • [2] Barst Robyn J, 2012, Pulm Circ, V2, P139, DOI 10.4103/2045-8932.97589
  • [3] Berra L, 2020, PROTOCOL RANDOMIZED
  • [4] Inhaled nitric oxide: Current clinical concepts
    Bhatraju, Pavan
    Crawford, Jack
    Hall, Michael
    Lang, John D., Jr.
    [J]. NITRIC OXIDE-BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2015, 50 : 114 - 128
  • [5] The effects of high-flow vs low-flow oxygen on exercise in advanced obstructive airways disease
    Chatila, W
    Nugent, T
    Vance, G
    Gaughan, J
    Criner, GJ
    [J]. CHEST, 2004, 126 (04) : 1108 - 1115
  • [6] Review of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in the Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Setting
    Checchia, Paul A.
    Bronicki, Ronald A.
    Goldstein, Brahm
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (04) : 493 - 505
  • [7] In Vitro-In Silico Comparison of Pulsed Oxygen Delivery From Portable Oxygen Concentrators Versus Continuous Flow Oxygen Delivery
    Chen, John Z.
    Katz, Ira M.
    Pichelin, Marine
    Zhu, Kaixian
    Caillibotte, Georges
    Finlay, Warren H.
    Martin, Andrew R.
    [J]. RESPIRATORY CARE, 2019, 64 (02) : 117 - 129
  • [8] Comparison of pulsed versus continuous oxygen delivery using realistic adult nasal airway replicas
    Chen, John Z.
    Katz, Ira M.
    Pichelin, Marine
    Zhu, Kaixian
    Caillibotte, Georges
    Noga, Michelle L.
    Finlay, Warren H.
    Martin, Andrew R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2017, 12 : 2559 - 2571
  • [9] Bench-to-bedside review: Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in adults
    Creagh-Brown, Benedict C.
    Griffiths, Mark J. D.
    Evans, Timothy W.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 13 (03) : 221
  • [10] Nitric Oxide Delivery by Neonatal Noninvasive Respiratory Support Devices
    DiBlasi, Robert M.
    Dupras, Donna
    Kearney, Christine
    Costa, Eddie, Jr.
    Griebel, Jeffrey L.
    [J]. RESPIRATORY CARE, 2015, 60 (02) : 219 - 230