Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Travel for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment and the Impact of Travel Distance on Survival

被引:55
作者
Graboyes, Evan M. [1 ,2 ]
Ellis, Mark A. [1 ]
Li, Hong [2 ,3 ]
Kaczmar, John M. [4 ]
Sharma, Anand K. [5 ]
Lentsch, Eric J. [1 ]
Day, Terry A. [1 ]
Halbert, Chanita Hughes [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 135 Rutledge Ave,MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ South Carolina, Hollings Canc Ctr, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Med, Div Med Oncol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[5] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Radiat Oncol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[6] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
head and neck cancer; health services; quality of care; racial disparities; travel distance; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PROSTATE-CANCER; HOSPITAL VOLUME; GEOGRAPHIC ACCESS; LARYNGEAL-CANCER; UNITED-STATES; CARE; ASSOCIATION; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.31571
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patients who travel a long distance (>= 50 miles) for cancer care have improved outcomes. However, to the authors' knowledge, the prevalence of long travel distances for treatment by patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and the effect of travel distance on overall survival (OS), remains unknown. METHODS:The authors used the National Cancer Data base from 2004 through 2013 to identify patients with HNSCC undergoing definitive treatment. Travel distance for treatment was categorized as short (<12.5 miles), intermediate (12.5-49.9 miles), and long (50-249.9 miles). The primary outcome, OS, was evaluated using Cox shared-frailty modeling. A secondary outcome, factors associated with intermediate and long travel distances, was evaluated using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 118,000 patients with HNSCC, 62,753 (53.2%), 40,644 (34.4%), and 14,603 (12.4%) patients, respectively, traveled short, intermediate, and long distances for treatment. After adjusting for relevant covariates, long travel distance was associated with treatment at academic and high-volume centers. Patients of black race, of Hispanic ethnicity, with Medicaid insurance, and who were treated with nonsurgical treatment were less likely to travel long distances for treatment (P<.001). Traveling a long distance for treatment was associated with improved OS on multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.96) compared with a short distance. CONCLUSIONS: Traveling a long distance for HNSCC treatment is associated with improved survival, especially for patients receiving nonsurgical management. Racial and ethnic disparities in travel for HNSCC treatment exist. As regionalization of care continues, future work should identify and address reasons for racial and ethnic disparities in travel that may prevent access to care at high-volume facilities. (C) 2018 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:3181 / 3191
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society, 2016, CANC FACTS FIGURES 2
[2]  
American College of Surgeons, 2016, NAT CANC DAT BAS DAT
[3]   Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery [J].
Begg, CB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Brennan, MF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20) :1747-1751
[4]   The National Cancer Data Base: A powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (03) :683-690
[5]   Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Marth, NJ ;
Goodman, DC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (20) :2703-2708
[6]   Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery [J].
Birkmeyer, John D. ;
Sun, Yating ;
Wong, Sandra L. ;
Stukel, Therese A. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (05) :777-783
[7]   Improved Survival Is Associated With Treatment at High-Volume Teaching Facilities for Patients With Advanced Stage Laryngeal Cancer [J].
Chen, Amy Y. ;
Fedewa, Stacey ;
Pavluck, Alex ;
Ward, Elizabeth M. .
CANCER, 2010, 116 (20) :4744-4752
[8]   Association Between Treatment at a High-Volume Facility and Improved Survival for Radiation-Treated Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Chen, Yu-Wei ;
Mahal, Brandon A. ;
Muralidhar, Vinayak ;
Nezolosky, Michelle ;
Beard, Clair J. ;
Den, Robert B. ;
Feng, Felix Y. ;
Hoffman, Karen E. ;
Martin, Neil E. ;
Orio, Peter F. ;
Nguyen, Paul L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 94 (04) :683-690
[9]   Treatment at High-Volume Facilities and Academic Centers Is Independently Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer [J].
David, John M. ;
Ho, Allen S. ;
Luu, Michael ;
Yoshida, Emi J. ;
Kim, Sungjin ;
Mita, Alain C. ;
Scher, Kevin S. ;
Shiao, Stephen L. ;
Tighiouart, Mourad ;
Zumsteg, Zachary S. .
CANCER, 2017, 123 (20) :3933-3942
[10]   Volume-outcome associations in head and neck cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Eskander, Antoine ;
Merdad, Mazin ;
Irish, Jonathan C. ;
Hall, Stephen F. ;
Groome, Patti A. ;
Freeman, Jeremy L. ;
Urbach, David R. ;
Goldstein, David P. .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2014, 36 (12) :1820-1834