Surgical management of large adrenal tumors: impact of different laparoscopic approaches and resection methods on perioperative and long-term outcomes

被引:19
作者
Chen, Wei [1 ]
Liang, Yong [1 ]
Lin, Wei [1 ]
Fu, Guang-Qing [1 ]
Ma, Zhi-Wei [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zigong 4 Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, Zigong 643000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Acad Med Sci, Dept Urol, 32 West Second Sect First Ring Rd, Chengdu 641000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, 32 West Second Sect First Ring Rd, Chengdu 641000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
BMC UROLOGY | 2018年 / 18卷
关键词
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Adrenal tumor; RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY; ENDOSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY; PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA; TRANSPERITONEAL; EXPERIENCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-018-0349-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The indication of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) was extended with the retroperitoneal approach and has been wildly accepted and technologically matured. However, the management of large adrenal tumors via this approach still remains controversial. The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive analysis on the minimally invasive surgical management of larger adrenal tumors. Methods: A total of 78 patients with large adrenal tumors (>5 cm) and 97 patients with smaller adrenal tumors (<5 cm) were enrolled in this study. The patient characteristics were preferentially analyzed. The intra-operative and postoperative indicators were compared between those who underwent RLA and those who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (TLA); the intra-operative and postoperative indicators were also compared between the large tumor group and smaller tumor group of those who underwent RLA. Furthermore, the analyses of partial RLA were focused on the perioperative indicators and follow-up results. Results: RLA was superior to TLA in terms of operation time (98.71 +/- 32.30 min vs. 124.36 +/- 34.62 min, respectively, P = 0.001), hospitalization duration (7.43 +/- 2.82 days vs. 8.91 +/- 3.40 days, respectively, P = 0.04), duration of drain (4.83 +/- 0.37 days vs. 3.94 +/- 2.21 days, respectively, P = 0.02), first oral intake (2.82 +/- 0.71 days vs. 1.90 +/- 0.83 days, respectively, P < 0.001) and time to ambulation (3.89 +/- 1.64 days vs. 2.61 +/- 1.42 days, respectively, P < 0.001). Further analyses of the RLA patients demonstrated that the larger tumor (> 5 cm) group showed superior results for the intraoperative indicators than the smaller tumor (< 5 cm) group (P < 0.05), while the results for the postoperative indicators between the two tumor size groups were similar (P > 0.05). Data confirmed that the partial resection method was superior to the total resection method from the perspective of the hormone supplement (0% vs. 48.15%, P = 0.002). The 2-year recurrence-free rates were 92.60 and 92.86% for the total and partial RLA resection methods, respectively (P = 0.97). The partial RLA resection method had a similar complete remission rate as the total RLA resection method (96.30% vs. 100%, respectively, P = 0.47). Conclusion: Both RLA and TLA seem to provide similar effects for the surgical management of large adrenal tumors. However, partial RLA resection should be considered for the management of benign tumors to reduce the hormone supplement.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Large Adrenal Masses: Pushing the Envelope
    Boylu, Ugur
    Oommen, Mathew
    Lee, Benjamin R.
    Thomas, Raju
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (06) : 971 - 975
  • [2] Castillo O, 2008, ITALIAN J UROLOGY NE, V60, P177
  • [3] Retroperitoneal Versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy in Adrenal Tumor: A Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Wei
    Li, Fei
    Chen, Dingnan
    Zhu, Yongtong
    He, Chengwu
    Du, Yuejun
    Tan, Wanlong
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (02) : 121 - 127
  • [4] Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large tumours: Single team experience
    Dalvi, Abhay N.
    Thapar, Pinky M.
    Thapar, Vinaykumar B.
    Rege, Sameer A.
    Deshpande, Aparna A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2012, 8 (04) : 125 - 128
  • [5] Has experience changed the scenario in laparoscopic adrenalectomy?
    Dalvi, Abhay N.
    Thapar, Pinky M.
    Shah, Nalini S.
    Menon, Padma S.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 71 (02) : 78 - 83
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: Another look at outcome using the Clavien classification system
    Eichhorn-Wharry, Laura I.
    Talpos, Gary B.
    Rubinfeld, Ilan
    [J]. SURGERY, 2012, 152 (06) : 1090 - 1095
  • [7] Comparison of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: results from American College of Surgeons-National Surgery Quality Improvement Project
    Elfenbein, Dawn M.
    Scarborough, John E.
    Speicher, Paul J.
    Scheri, Randall P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 184 (01) : 216 - 220
  • [8] Fiszer Patryk, 2012, Pol Przegl Chir, V84, P293, DOI 10.2478/v10035-012-0049-5
  • [9] Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: The retroperitoneal approach
    Gasman, D
    Droupy, S
    Koutani, A
    Salomon, L
    Antiphon, P
    Chassagnon, J
    Chopin, DK
    Abbou, CC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (06) : 1816 - 1820
  • [10] Risk factors for conversion and complications after unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy
    Gaujoux, S.
    Bonnet, S.
    Leconte, M.
    Zohar, S.
    Bertherat, J.
    Bertagna, X.
    Dousset, B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (10) : 1392 - 1399