Prospective Evaluation of a Low-Dose Radiation Fluoroscopy Protocol for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:11
作者
Tumialan, Luis M. [1 ,2 ]
Clark, Justin C. [1 ]
Snyder, Laura A. [1 ]
Jasmer, Gary [2 ]
Marciano, Frederick F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Josephs Hosp, Barrow Neurol Inst, Div Neurol Surg, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
[2] HonorHlth Res Inst, Spine Grp Arizona, Div Neurol Surg, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
Fluoroscopy; Lumbar spine; Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Radiation exposure; Radiation safety; Spine surgery; PULSED FLUOROSCOPY; IONIZING-RADIATION; SPINE SURGERY; EXPOSURE; REDUCTION; TECHNOLOGY; NAVIGATION; CHILDREN; QUALITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1227/NEU.0000000000000960
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Recent research on radiation exposure in minimally invasive surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) has led to the development of a low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol, with resulting reductions in fluoroscopy times and radiation exposures. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate a previously reported low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol for MIS TLIF. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of the low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol for MIS TLIF was performed for 65 consecutive patients. Total fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and operative times were prospectively analyzed for all enrolled patients. RESULTS: Sixty-five consecutive patients (43 women; 22 men) who underwent an MIS TLIF were prospectively enrolled in this study of the low-dose fluoroscopy protocol. A total of 260 pedicle screws were placed. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (range, 46-82 years). They had a mean operative time of 178.7 minutes (range, 119247 minutes), a mean fluoroscopic time of 10.43 seconds (range, 5-24 seconds), and a mean radiation dose of 0.295 mGy x m(2) (range, 0.092-0.314 mGy x m(2)). CONCLUSION: The combination of low-dose pulsed images and digital spot images in a low-dose protocol decreases fluoroscopy times and radiation doses in patients undergoing MIS TLIF without compromising visualization of the bony anatomy or the safety and efficiency of the procedure. The application of this low-dose protocol uncouples the otherwise linear relationship between fluoroscopy times and radiation dose. This is due primarily to the use of the digital spot technique. Equal emphasis should be placed on radiation dose and acquisition time to optimize this protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 544
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis [J].
Chandra, Vemula V. R. ;
Prasad, Bodapati C. M. ;
Hanu, Tammireddy G. ;
Kale, Pavan G. .
NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) :127-134
[32]   Predictors of Poor Outcome in Patients Submitted to Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion [J].
Costa, Jose ;
Silva, Pedro Santos ;
Cunha, Marisa ;
Almeida, Mariana ;
Vaz, Rui ;
Pereira, Paulo .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 119 :488-493
[33]   Does Gender Influence Postoperative Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion? [J].
Khechen, Benjamin ;
Haws, Brittany E. ;
Patel, Dil, V ;
Cardinal, Kaitlyn L. ;
Ganda, Jordan A. ;
Singh, Kern .
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (02) :E107-E111
[34]   Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Cost of a Surgeon's Learning Curve [J].
Garcia, Diogo ;
Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo ;
De Biase, Gaetano ;
Ruiz-Garcia, Henry ;
Akinduro, Oluwaseun O. ;
Dholakia, Ruchita ;
Borah, Bijan ;
Fox, W. Christopher ;
Nottmeier, Eric ;
Deen, H. Gordon ;
Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley ;
Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo ;
Chen, Selby .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 162 :E1-E7
[35]   The Use of Augmented Reality as an Educational Tool in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion [J].
Schmidt, Franziska A. ;
Hussain, Ibrahim ;
Boadi, Blake ;
Sommer, Fabian J. ;
Thome, Claudius ;
Haertl, Roger .
OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 28 (02) :183-192
[36]   Evidence-Based Review of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Is Minimally Invasive Better? [J].
Kaloostian, Paul E. ;
Gokaslan, Ziya L. .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (1-2) :65-67
[37]   Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation [J].
Liu, Chao ;
Zhou, Yue .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 98 :14-20
[38]   Surgeons' Exposure to Radiation in Single- and Multi-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion; A Prospective Study [J].
Funao, Haruki ;
Ishii, Ken ;
Momoshima, Suketaka ;
Iwanami, Akio ;
Hosogane, Naobumi ;
Watanabe, Kota ;
Nakamura, Masaya ;
Toyama, Yoshiaki ;
Matsumoto, Morio .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04)
[39]   Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Kou, Yuanqiao ;
Chang, Jianjun ;
Guan, Xiaoming ;
Chang, Qiang ;
Feng, Haoyu .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 :E352-E368
[40]   Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis [J].
Hu, Xijian ;
Yan, Lei ;
Jin, Xinjie ;
Liu, Haifeng ;
Chai, Jing ;
Zhao, Bin .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (01) :295-305