Prospective Evaluation of a Low-Dose Radiation Fluoroscopy Protocol for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:11
作者
Tumialan, Luis M. [1 ,2 ]
Clark, Justin C. [1 ]
Snyder, Laura A. [1 ]
Jasmer, Gary [2 ]
Marciano, Frederick F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Josephs Hosp, Barrow Neurol Inst, Div Neurol Surg, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
[2] HonorHlth Res Inst, Spine Grp Arizona, Div Neurol Surg, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
Fluoroscopy; Lumbar spine; Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Radiation exposure; Radiation safety; Spine surgery; PULSED FLUOROSCOPY; IONIZING-RADIATION; SPINE SURGERY; EXPOSURE; REDUCTION; TECHNOLOGY; NAVIGATION; CHILDREN; QUALITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1227/NEU.0000000000000960
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Recent research on radiation exposure in minimally invasive surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) has led to the development of a low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol, with resulting reductions in fluoroscopy times and radiation exposures. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate a previously reported low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol for MIS TLIF. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of the low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol for MIS TLIF was performed for 65 consecutive patients. Total fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and operative times were prospectively analyzed for all enrolled patients. RESULTS: Sixty-five consecutive patients (43 women; 22 men) who underwent an MIS TLIF were prospectively enrolled in this study of the low-dose fluoroscopy protocol. A total of 260 pedicle screws were placed. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (range, 46-82 years). They had a mean operative time of 178.7 minutes (range, 119247 minutes), a mean fluoroscopic time of 10.43 seconds (range, 5-24 seconds), and a mean radiation dose of 0.295 mGy x m(2) (range, 0.092-0.314 mGy x m(2)). CONCLUSION: The combination of low-dose pulsed images and digital spot images in a low-dose protocol decreases fluoroscopy times and radiation doses in patients undergoing MIS TLIF without compromising visualization of the bony anatomy or the safety and efficiency of the procedure. The application of this low-dose protocol uncouples the otherwise linear relationship between fluoroscopy times and radiation dose. This is due primarily to the use of the digital spot technique. Equal emphasis should be placed on radiation dose and acquisition time to optimize this protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 544
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis in patients with significant obesity
    Lau, Darryl
    Ziewacz, John
    Park, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (01) : 80 - 83
  • [22] Effects of Preoperative Simulation on Minimally Invasive Hybrid Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Rieger, Bernhard
    Jiang, Hongzhen
    Reinshagen, Clemens
    Molcanyi, Marek
    Zivcak, Jozef
    Gronemeyer, Dietrich
    Bosche, Bert
    Schackert, Gabriele
    Ruess, Daniel
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 106 : 578 - 588
  • [23] Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature
    Joseph, Jacob R.
    Smith, Brandon W.
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2015, 39 (04)
  • [24] A Prospective Comparison of the Effects of Instrument Tracking on Time and Radiation During Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Hamouda, Farah
    Wang, Timothy Y.
    Gabr, Mostafa
    Mehta, Vikram A.
    Bwensa, Alexia M.
    Foster, Norah
    Than, Khoi D.
    Goodwin, Rory C.
    Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 : E101 - E111
  • [25] Computer-assisted Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion without C-arm Fluoroscopy
    Tanaka, Masato
    Sugimoto, Yoshiharu
    Arataki, Shinya
    Takigawa, Tomoyuki
    Ozaki, Toshifumi
    ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 2016, 70 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [26] Minimally Invasive Far Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Doria, Carlo
    Balsano, Massimo
    Rampal, Virginie
    Solla, Federico
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (05) : 512 - 516
  • [27] Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Where Are We Now?
    Dada, Abraham
    Saggi, Satvir
    Ambati, Vardhaan S.
    Patel, Arati
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 96 (3S) : S33 - S41
  • [28] Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chandra, Vemula V. R.
    Prasad, Bodapati C. M.
    Hanu, Tammireddy G.
    Kale, Pavan G.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) : 127 - 134
  • [29] Visualization in the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: From Tubular to Endoscopic Approaches
    Vyas, Daivik B.
    Park, Brian J.
    Wang, Michael Y.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 96 (3S) : S26 - S32
  • [30] Predictors of Poor Outcome in Patients Submitted to Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Costa, Jose
    Silva, Pedro Santos
    Cunha, Marisa
    Almeida, Mariana
    Vaz, Rui
    Pereira, Paulo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 119 : 488 - 493