Effect of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infection on Post-transplant Outcomes

被引:61
|
作者
Schulman, Allison R. [1 ]
Martens, Timothy P. [1 ]
Russo, Mark J. [1 ]
Christos, Paul J. [2 ]
Gordon, Rachel J. [1 ]
Lowy, Franklin D. [1 ]
Oz, Mehmet C. [1 ]
Naka, Yoshifumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiothorac Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Publ Hlth, Div Biostat & Epidemiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
IMPLANTATION; SUPPORT; HYPOGAMMAGLOBULINEMIA; TRANSPLANTATION; PREVENTION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; SURFACE; BRIDGE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2008.12.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: in this study, we sought to confirm which types of device-related infections impact bridge-to-transplant rates. We also aimed to determine the effect of device-related infections on post-transplant survival and post-transplant infection. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed paper and electronic medical records for 149 patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a bridge to transplantation at the Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center between 2000 and 2006. The primary outcome measures were survival to transplantation, post-transplant infection and post-transplant survival. Results: Patients with sepsis were less likely to be successfully bridged to cardiac transplantation (7 of 22 vs 103 of 127, 31.8% vs 81.1%, p = 0.01). However, if transplanted, their survival rates at 1 year were not decreased (6 of 7 vs 85 of 103, 85.7% vs 82.5%, p = 1.00). No other pre-transplant device-related infection affected post-transplant survival at 1 year (22 of 27 vs 69 of 83, 81.5% vs 83.1%, P = 1.00). Pre-transplant drive-fine infections predicted post-transplant: infection in former drive-line or pocket sites (11 of 16 vs 14 of 94, 68.8% vs 14.9%, p = 0.01) and increased overall post-transplant hospital length of stay (16 vs 19 days, p = 0.04). They did not, however, affect post-transplant survival at I year (22 of 25 vs 69 of 85, 88% vs 81.2%, p = 0.56). Conclusions: Although survival to transplantation was diminished in LVAD patients with sepsis, if successfully transplanted, post-transplant survival was unaffected. Patients with local device infections and signs of early sepsis may warrant evaluation for urgent transplantation. A pre-transplant drive-line infection was associated with post-transplant infection in either the former pocket or drive-line site, and increased overall length of stay, but it did not decrease post-transplant survival. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009;28:237-42. Copyright (C) 2009 by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 242
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of Less Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation on Heart Transplant Outcomes
    Riebandt, Julia
    Wiedemann, Dominik
    Sandner, Sigrid
    Angleitner, Philipp
    Zuckermann, Andreas
    Schloeglhofer, Thomas
    Laufer, Guenther
    Zimpfer, Daniel
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 34 (01) : 148 - 156
  • [32] The diagnosis of left ventricular assist device thrombosis
    Gerds, H. Z. R.
    Brugemann, J.
    Rienstra, M.
    Erasmus, M. E.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 23 (7-8) : 389 - 391
  • [33] Left Ventricular Assist Device Management and Complications
    Birati, Edo Y.
    Rame, J. Eduardo
    CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2014, 30 (03) : 607 - +
  • [34] Effect of Neurohormonal Blockade Drug Therapy on Outcomes and Left Ventricular Function and Structure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Grupper, Avishay
    Zhao, Yanjun M.
    Sajgalik, Pavol
    Joyce, Lyle D.
    Park, Soon J.
    Pereira, Naveen L.
    Stulak, John M.
    Burnett, John C., Jr.
    Edwards, Brooks S.
    Daly, Richard C.
    Kushwaha, Sudhir S.
    Schirger, John A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 117 (11) : 1765 - 1770
  • [35] Left ventricular assist device driveline infection and the frequency of dressing change in hospitalized patients
    Wus, Lisa
    Manning, MaryLou
    Entwistle, John W. C., III
    HEART & LUNG, 2015, 44 (03): : 225 - 229
  • [36] Impact of durable ventricular assist devices on post-transplant outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease
    Cedars, Ari
    Burchill, Luke
    Roche, S. Lucy
    Menachem, Jonathan
    Axsom, Kelly
    Tecson, Kristen
    CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE, 2019, 14 (06) : 958 - 962
  • [37] Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes
    Smith, LaVone A.
    Yarboro, Leora T.
    Kennedy, Jamie L. W.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2015, 7 (12) : 2088 - 2096
  • [38] Outcomes After Concomitant Procedures with Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Implications by Device Type and Indication
    Maltais, Simon
    Haglund, Nicholas A.
    Davis, Mary E.
    Aaronson, Keith D.
    Pagani, Francis D.
    Dunlay, Shannon M.
    Stulak, John M.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (04) : 403 - 409
  • [39] Pre-transplant ventricular assist device explant
    Khoshbin, Espeed
    Schueler, Stephan
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 7 (01) : 160 - 168
  • [40] Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Chesdachai, Supavit
    Yetmar, Zachary A.
    Mendoza, Maria A.
    Ranganath, Nischal
    Schettle, Sarah D.
    Boilson, Barry A.
    Shah, Aditya S.
    Razonable, Raymund R.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2023, 69 (10) : 950 - 955