Looming Motion Primes the Visuomotor System

被引:17
作者
Skarratt, Paul A. [1 ]
Gellatly, Angus R. H. [2 ,3 ]
Cole, Geoff G. [4 ]
Pilling, Michael [5 ]
Hulleman, Johan [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Dept Psychol, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[2] Oxford Brookes Univ, Dept Psychol, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[3] ASTAR, Inst High Performance Comp, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Univ Essex, Dept Psychol, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[5] Oxford Brookes Univ, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Sch Psychol Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
attentional capture; motor priming; looming; receding; motion; CHANGE DETECTION PARADIGM; CAPTURE VISUAL-ATTENTION; TIME-TO-CONTACT; SUPERIOR COLLICULUS; RHESUS-MONKEY; PERCEPTUAL SELECTIVITY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; SUBJECTIVE DURATION; OBJECT APPEARANCE;
D O I
10.1037/a0034456
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A wealth of evidence now shows that human and animal observers display greater sensitivity to objects that move toward them than to objects that remain static or move away. Increased sensitivity in humans is often evidenced by reaction times that increase in rank order from looming, to receding, to static targets. However, it is not clear whether the processing advantage enjoyed by looming motion is mediated by the attention system or the motor system. The present study investigated this by first examining whether sensitivity is to looming motion per se or to certain monocular or binocular cues that constitute stereoscopic motion in depth. None of the cues accounted for the looming advantage. A perceptual measure was then used to examine performance with minimal involvement of the motor system. Results showed that looming and receding motion were equivalent in attracting attention, suggesting that the looming advantage is indeed mediated by the motor system. These findings suggest that although motion itself is sufficient for attentional capture, motion direction can prime motor responses.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 579
页数:14
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Motion onset captures attention: A rejoinder to Franconeri and Simons (2005)
    Abrams, RA
    Christ, SE
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2006, 68 (01): : 114 - 117
  • [2] Onset but not offset of irrelevant motion disrupts inhibition of return
    Abrams, RA
    Christ, SE
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2005, 67 (08): : 1460 - 1467
  • [3] The onset of receding motion captures attention: Comment on Franconeri and Simons (2003)
    Abrams, RA
    Christ, SE
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2005, 67 (02): : 219 - 223
  • [4] Motion onset captures attention
    Abrams, RA
    Christ, SE
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (05) : 427 - 432
  • [5] Looming sounds as warning signals: The function of motion cues
    Bach, Dominik R.
    Neuhoff, John G.
    Perrig, Walter
    Seifritz, Erich
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 74 (01) : 28 - 33
  • [6] Neural processing of imminent collision in humans
    Billington, Jac
    Wilkie, Richard M.
    Field, David T.
    Wann, John P.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 278 (1711) : 1476 - 1481
  • [7] VERTICAL DISPARITY, EGOCENTRIC DISTANCE AND STEREOSCOPIC DEPTH CONSTANCY - A NEW INTERPRETATION
    BISHOP, PO
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1989, 237 (1289): : 445 - 469
  • [8] The FeatureGate model of visual selection
    Cave, KR
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1999, 62 (2-3): : 182 - 194
  • [9] Change blindness and the primacy of object appearance
    Cole, Geoff G.
    Liversedge, Simon R.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (04) : 588 - 593
  • [10] Attentional capture by object appearance and disappearance
    Cole, Geoff G.
    Kuhn, Gustav
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (01) : 147 - 159