Totally extraperitoneal repair under general anesthesia versus Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia for unilateral inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial

被引:39
|
作者
Dhankhar, Devi S.
Sharma, Naveen [1 ]
Mishra, Tushar
Kaur, Navneet
Singh, Seema
Gupta, Sanjay
机构
[1] UCMS, Dept Surg, Delhi, India
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2014年 / 28卷 / 03期
关键词
Anesthesia; Clinical papers/trials/research; Hernia; Pain; Quality of life; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OPEN MESH REPAIR; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSES; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-013-3269-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Lichtenstein repair (preferably under local anesthesia) or totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP) are both good options for treating uncomplicated unilateral inguinal hernia. We performed a prospective randomized trial to compare the outcome of TEP repair under general anesthesia versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty under local anesthesia. Adult men with primary unilateral inguinal hernia without any history of lower abdominal surgery were assessed for inclusion in the study. Of the 194 patients assessed for eligibility for recruitment in the trial, 72 were recruited in the trial and randomized into two groups of 36 patients each. A per-protocol analysis was performed. Patients were followed for a period of 3 months. Pain was assessed by a visual analog scale, and quality of life was assessed by the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire, version 2. A total of 59 patients were analyzed at the end of the study, 30 in the Lichtenstein group and 29 in the TEP group. The operating time (75.93 +/- A 13.68 vs. 64.77 +/- A 12.66 min, p = 0.002) and total operating room time (102.66 +/- A 15.676 vs. 72.64 +/- A 12.25 min, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the TEP group. Postoperative pain scores in the TEP group were lower than the scores in Lichtenstein group, but the difference was not statistically significant. There was significantly more use of analgesics and higher C-reactive protein levels in the Lichtenstein group. Quality of life and patient satisfaction were similar in both groups. Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia is as good as TEP under general anesthesia. The shorter operating room time, smaller mesh size, and lower cost of local anesthetic drugs all contribute to make Lichtenstein repair the better choice for repair of uncomplicated unilateral inguinal hernia, especially in developing nations with scarce resources.
引用
收藏
页码:996 / 1002
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Totally extraperitoneal repair under general anesthesia versus Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia for unilateral inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Devi S. Dhankhar
    Naveen Sharma
    Tushar Mishra
    Navneet Kaur
    Seema Singh
    Sanjay Gupta
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 996 - 1002
  • [2] Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair Under Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia
    Donmez, Turgut
    Tulubas, Evrim Kucur
    Bostanci, Ipek
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2024, 34 (06) : 566 - 570
  • [3] The feasibility of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair under local anesthesia
    Ferzli, G
    Sayad, P
    Vasisht, B
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (06): : 588 - 590
  • [4] Open mesh and laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair under spinal and general anesthesia
    Sunamak, Oguzhan
    Donmez, Turgut
    Yildirim, Dogan
    Hut, Adnan
    Erdem, Vuslat Muslu
    Erdem, Duygu Ayfer
    Ozata, Ibrahim Halil
    Cakir, Mikail
    Uzman, Sinan
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 14 : 1839 - 1845
  • [5] Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Krishna, Asuri
    Misra, M. C.
    Bansal, Virinder Kumar
    Kumar, Subodh
    Rajeshwari, S.
    Chabra, Anjolie
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (03): : 639 - 649
  • [6] Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Asuri Krishna
    M. C. Misra
    Virinder Kumar Bansal
    Subodh Kumar
    S. Rajeshwari
    Anjolie Chabra
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 639 - 649
  • [7] Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair Compared With Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial) A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Langeveld, Hester R.
    van't Riet, Martijne
    Weidema, Wibo F.
    Stassen, Laurents P. S.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Lange, Johan
    Bonjer, Hendrik J.
    Jeekel, Johannes
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 251 (05) : 819 - 824
  • [8] Randomized clinical trial comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (TEPLICH trial)
    Gutlic, N.
    Gutlic, A.
    Petersson, U.
    Rogmark, P.
    Montgomery, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 (07) : 845 - 855
  • [9] Local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair in adolescents
    Olsha O.
    Feldman A.
    Odenheimer D.B.
    Frankel D.
    Hernia, 2007, 11 (6) : 497 - 500
  • [10] Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes Between Totally Extraperitoneal and Lichtenstein Repair of Inguinal Hernia: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Yigit, Banu
    Liman, Rumeysa Kevser
    Agackiran, Ibrahim
    Citgez, Bulent
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (11): : 1025 - 1032