Attitudes toward Video-Assisted Debriefing after simulation in undergraduate nursing students: An application of Q methodology

被引:40
作者
Ha, Eun-Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Red Cross Coll Nursing, Seoul 156756, South Korea
关键词
Attitude; Debriefing; Simulation; Undergraduate nursing students; HIGH-FIDELITY; PATIENT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2014.01.003
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Video-Assisted Debriefing (VAD) provides an affirmative self-reflection through reviewing what went right, what went wrong, what had to be done, and what should be done in the future. Objective: To identify attitudes toward Video-Assisted Debriefing after a simulation in undergraduate nursing students. Design: Q-methodology, which has been identified as a method for the analysis of subjective viewpoints and to have the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative methods, was used. Setting: College of Nursing in Seoul. Participants: A convenience P-sample consisting of 44 third-year undergraduate nursing students. Methods: Thirty-nine selected Q-statements from each of 44 participants (P-sample) were classified into the shape of a normal distribution using a 9-point bipolar scale from 4 for strongly disagree to +4 for strongly agree. The collected data were analyzed using the pc-QUANL program. Results: Three discrete factors emerged: Factor I (VAD helps self-reflection; strategic view), Factor II (VAD makes us tired and humiliated; reluctant view), and Factor III (VAD boosts self-confidence; forward view). Conclusion: The findings could be used as a cornerstone for application of customized debriefing method to undergraduate nursing students. Debriefing techniques considering student's individual learning style. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 984
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Q-methodology in nursing research - A promising method for the study of subjectivity [J].
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori ;
Baumann, Andrea ;
Cordingley, Lis .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2008, 30 (06) :759-773
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, POLITICAL SUBJECTIVI
[3]   Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing Bringing Science to the Art of Debriefing in Surgery [J].
Arora, Sonal ;
Ahmed, Maria ;
Paige, John ;
Nestel, Debra ;
Runnacles, Jane ;
Hull, Louise ;
Darzi, Ara ;
Sevdalis, Nick .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (06) :982-988
[4]   Looking in the mirror: Self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises [J].
Boet, Sylvain ;
Bould, M. Dylan ;
Bruppacher, Heinz R. ;
Desjardins, Francois ;
Chandra, Deven B. ;
Naik, Viren N. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (06) :1377-1381
[5]   Effect of videotape feedback on anaesthetists' performance while managing simulated anaesthetic crises: a multicentre study [J].
Byrne, AJ ;
Sellen, AJ ;
Jones, JG ;
Aitkenhead, AR ;
Hussain, S ;
Gilder, F ;
Smith, HL ;
Ribes, P .
ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 57 (02) :176-179
[6]  
Cantrell M.A., 2008, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, V4, pe19, DOI [10.1016/j.ecns.2008.06.006, DOI 10.1016/J.ECNS.2008.06.006]
[7]   Nursing Students' Anxiety and Clinical Performance [J].
Cheung, Ryan Yat-Ming ;
Au, Terry Kit-fong .
JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2011, 50 (05) :286-289
[8]  
Chinnis AS, 2001, J NURS ADMIN, V31, P252
[9]  
Chronister C., 2012, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, V8, pe281, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ECNS.2010.12.005
[10]   Debriefing after resuscitation [J].
Couper, Keith ;
Perkins, Gavin D. .
CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 19 (03) :188-194