Neoral dose adjustment after conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring in stable renal transplant recipients: A prospective single center study

被引:0
|
作者
Sandrini, S
Bossini, N
Setti, G
Mazzucchelli, C
Maiorca, P
Cancarini, G
机构
[1] Spedali Civili Hosp, Brescia, Italy
[2] Univ Brescia, Div Nephrol, Brescia, Italy
关键词
C2; monitaring; kidney transplantation; neoral; cyclosporine therapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To determine the clinical impact of conversion from C0 to C2 Neoral monitoring, we conducted a 6-month prospective study in 62 stable renal transplant recipients. Neoral was given alone (19%), with steroids (31%), combined with azathioprine (Aza) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (50%). C0 and C2 target ranges were, respectively, 130-190 and 700-900 ng/mL. Neoral dosages were adjusted according to the C2 range. At baseline, mean C0 and C2 were 157 and 762 ng/mL. After 6 months C0 was 173 ng/mL (p<0.02) and C2 was 804 ng/mL (ns). Although the mean Neoral dose at 6 months was unchanged from baseline, the dose was reduced in 24 patients from 3.6 +/- 1.2 to 3.0 +/- 0.9 mg/kg/day, with a mean reduction in serum creatinine (Cr) from 1.4 +/- 0.4 to 1.3 +/- 0.3 mg/dL (p<0.001), stable in 8 patients and increased in 30 patients from 3.3 +/- 1.0 to 3.8 +/- 1. 2 mg/kg/day with no change in serum Cr. Serum transaminases and blood pressure (BP) were unchanged in the three groups. C0 and C2 showed a positive correlation, but with a large dispersion of values (r2=0.14, p<0.001). Overall concordance between the C0 and C2 ranges was 49%. Therefore, in stable transplant patients C0 cannot be considered a C2 surrogate. The conversion from C0 to C2 led to a Neoral dose reduction in approximately 40% of patients with significant improvement in renal function. Most of the remaining patients required an increased dose; however, without an increased incidence of cyclosporin-induced side-effects.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 290
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Observational study on the conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring of cyclosporine (Neoral) in stable liver transplant recipients
    Situmorang, G
    Jones, R
    Berry, R
    Fink, M
    Wang, BZ
    Gow, P
    Angus, P
    IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY, 2004, 82 (02): : A22 - A22
  • [2] Comparison of Neoral® dose monitoring with C0 and C2 in stable renal tranplant patients.
    Marcen, R
    Tato, AM
    Pascual, J
    Merino, JL
    Villafruela, JJ
    Teruel, JL
    Rivera, ME
    Burgos, FJ
    Ortuno, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 : 370A - 371A
  • [3] Neoral drug monitoring in stable kidney allotransplant recipients:: C0 versus C2
    Lukaschek, J
    Hofmann, J
    Aerne, D
    Ambühl, P
    Kistler, T
    Knoflach, A
    Pei, P
    Binswanger, U
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) : 3104 - 3105
  • [4] Monitoring of Neoral (CsA) in stable renal transplant recipients by C2 levels
    Housawi, AA
    Ward, H
    Murabit, AM
    Shoker, AS
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 : 370A - 370A
  • [5] Optimizing Neoral therapeutic drug monitoring with cyclosporine trough (C0) and C2 concentrations in stable renal allograft recipients
    Einecke, G
    Mai, I
    Diekmann, F
    Fritsche, L
    Boehler, T
    Neumayer, HH
    Budde, K
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) : 3102 - 3103
  • [6] Neoral (cyclosporine) C2 monitoring in renal transplant recipients:: A single-center experience in Asia
    Wong, HS
    Morad, Z
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (01) : 230 - 231
  • [7] C2 and C0 values for monitoring cyclosporine therapy in stable heart transplant recipients
    Diciolla, F
    Scolletta, S
    Berti, L
    Maccherini, M
    Federici, D
    Bernazzali, S
    Lisi, G
    Chiavarelli, M
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (02) : 1355 - 1359
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Changing From Cyclosporine C0 to C2 Monitoring in Stable Recipients Following Renal Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Zhang, Y.
    Zhang, X. D.
    Wang, Y.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 43 (10) : 3697 - 3701
  • [9] Efficacy of C0 and C2 monitoring in adult liver transplant recipients treated with neoral, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids
    Treckmann, J.
    Paul, A.
    Oezcelik, A.
    Saner, F.
    Malago, M.
    Nadalin, S.
    Lang, H.
    Malamutman, E.
    Gerken, G.
    Broeisch, C. E.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (10) : 3234 - 3236
  • [10] Comparison between C0 and C2 monitoring in de novo renal transplant recipients:: Retrospective analysis of a single-center experience
    Bîrsan, T
    Loinig, C
    Bodingbauer, M
    Wekerle, T
    Rockenschaub, S
    Berlakovich, G
    Soliman, T
    Muhlbacher, F
    Steininger, R
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (12) : 1787 - 1791