Evaluation of Introduction of a Delayed Cord Clamping Protocol for Premature Neonates in a High-Volume Maternity Center

被引:18
作者
Liu, Lilly Y. [1 ]
Feinglass, Joe M.
Khan, Janine Y.
Gerber, Susan E.
Grobman, William A.
Yee, Lynn M.
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1176 Fifth Ave, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
PRETERM INFANTS; HEMORRHAGE; BORN;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001987
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence to a delayed cord clamping protocol for preterm births in the first 2 years after its introduction, perform a quality improvement assessment, and determine neonatal outcomes associated with protocol implementation and adherence. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of women delivering singleton neonates at 23-32 weeks of gestation in the 2 years before (preprotocol) and 2 years after (postprotocol) introduction of a 30-second delayed cord clamping protocol at a large-volume academic center. This policy was communicated to obstetric and pediatric health care providers and nurses and reinforced with intermittent educational reviews. Barriers to receiving delayed cord clamping were assessed using chi(2) tests and multivariable logistic regression. Neonatal outcomes then were compared between all neonates in the preprotocol period and all neonates in the postprotocol period and between all neonates in the preprotocol period and neonates receiving delayed cord clamping in the postprotocol period using multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 427 eligible neonates, 187 were born postprotocol. Of these, 53.5% (n=100) neonates received delayed cord clamping according to the protocol. The rate of delayed cord clamping preprotocol was 0%. Protocol uptake and frequency of delayed cord clamping increased over the 2 years after its introduction. In the postprotocol period, cesarean delivery was the only factor independently associated with failing to receive delayed cord clamping (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.96). In comparison with the preprotocol period, those who received delayed cord clamping in the postprotocol period had significantly higher birth hematocrit (beta=2.46, P=.007) and fewer blood transfusions in the first week of life (adjusted OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.96). CONCLUSION: After introduction of an institutional delayed cord clamping protocol followed by continued health care provider education and quality feedback, the frequency of delayed cord clamping progressively increased. Compared with historical controls, performing delayed cord clamping in eligible preterm neonates was associated with improved neonatal hematologic indices, demonstrating the effectiveness of delayed cord clamping in a large-volume maternity unit.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 843
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AAP, 2013, PEDIATRICS, V131, pe1323
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Obstet Gynecol, V120, P1522, DOI DOI 10.1097/00006250-201212000-00045
[3]  
[Anonymous], Born Too Soon: The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, OBSTET GYNECOL, V126, pe127
[5]  
[Anonymous], OBSTET GYNECOL
[6]   A Single-Center Experience of Implementing Delayed Cord Clamping in Babies Born at Less Than 33 Weeks' Gestational Age [J].
Aziz, Khalid ;
Chinnery, Heather ;
Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry .
ADVANCES IN NEONATAL CARE, 2012, 12 (06) :371-376
[7]   NEONATAL NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS - THERAPEUTIC DECISIONS BASED UPON CLINICAL STAGING [J].
BELL, MJ ;
TERNBERG, JL ;
FEIGIN, RD ;
KEATING, JP ;
MARSHALL, R ;
BARTON, L ;
BROTHERTON, T .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1978, 187 (01) :1-7
[8]   Effect of delayed cord clamping on very preterm infants [J].
Chiruvolu, Arpitha ;
Tolia, Veeral N. ;
Qin, Huanying ;
Stone, Genna Leal ;
Rich, Diana ;
Conant, Rhoda J. ;
Inzer, Robert W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (05) :676.e1-676.e7
[9]  
Fanaroff Avroy A, 2007, Am J Obstet Gynecol, V196, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.014
[10]   Premature Birth Complications Top Cause of Death in Children Younger Than 5 Years [J].
Friedrich, M. J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (03) :235-235