Mathematically formulated key performance indicators for design and evaluation of treatment trains for resource recovery from urban wastewater

被引：20

作者：

van Schaik, Maria O. ^{[1
]}

Sucu, Seda ^{[2
]}

Cappon, Hans J. ^{[1
,3
]}

Chen, Wei-Shan ^{[3
]}

Martinson, D. Brett ^{[4
]}

Ouelhadj, Djamila ^{[2
]}

Rijnaarts, Huub H. M. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] HZ Univ Appl Sci, PO364, NL-4380 AT Vlissingen, Netherlands

[2] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Maths & Phys, Portsmouth, Hants, England

[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Technol, PO17, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands

[4] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Engn & Surveying, Portsmouth, Hants, England

来源：

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT | 2021年 / 282卷

关键词：

Resource recovery; Urban wastewater key; Performance indicators treatment train evaluation; Unit process evaluation; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL; TREATMENT SYSTEMS; SUSTAINABILITY; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; NUTRIENTS; METHODOLOGY; ACCEPTANCE; MANAGEMENT; FACILITIES;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111916

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

While urban wastewater infrastructure is aging and no longer adequate, climate change and sustainability are urging the transition from pollution management to resource recovery. Lacking evidence-based quantitative evaluation of the potential benefits and consequences of resource recovery from wastewater hinders the negotiation amongst stakeholders and slows down the transition. This study proposes mathematical formulations for technical, environmental, economic, and social key performance indicators (KPIs) that can be used to quantify the benefits and the risks of resource recovery. The proposed formulations are derived from the literature and validated with stakeholders. Each KPI is mathematically formulated at treatment train level by considering: (1) the characteristics of individual unit processes (UPs) in the treatment train (TT), (2) the context in which the TT is installed, and (3) the resources to be recovered. The mathematical formulations of the KPIs proposed in this study enable a transparent, consistent and informative evaluation of existing treatment trains, as well as support the (computer aided) design of new ones. This could aid the transition from urban wastewater treatment to resource recovery from urban wastewater.

引用

页数：10

共 70 条

[1]

Affleck M., 2016, WATERS DIGITAL FUTUR

[2] Harvesting urban resources towards more resilient cities [J].

Agudelo-Vera, Claudia M. ;

Leduc, Wouter R. W. A. ;

Mels, Adriaan R. ;

Rijnaarts, Huub H. M. .

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2012, 64 :3-12

[3] Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework [J].

Angelis, Aris ;

Kanavos, Panos .

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 188 :137-156

[4]

[Anonymous], 2016, Guidelines on Integrating Water Reuse into Water Planning and Management in the Context of the WFD

[5]

[Anonymous], 2012, GUIDELINES WATER REU

[6]

[Anonymous], 2018, WHO ENV NOISE GUIDEL

[7]

Balkema JJ., 2002, URBAN WATER, V4, P153, DOI [10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00014-6, DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00014-6]

[8]

Berglund B., 1999, World health organization: Guidelines for community noise

[9] How to analyse urban resource cycles: a dynamic systems approach to facilitate decision-making [J].

Bozileva, Elvira ;

Leusbrock, Ingo ;

Cappon, Hans J. ;

Rijnaarts, Huub H. ;

Keesman, Karel J. .

IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (02) :541-546

[10] Political and Professional Agency Entrapment: An Agenda for Urban Water Research [J].

Brown, Rebekah ;

Ashley, Richard ;

Farrelly, Megan .

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2011, 25 (15) :4037-4050

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →