The Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

被引:8
作者
Denteneer, Lenie [1 ]
Van Daele, Ulrike [1 ]
Truijen, Steven [1 ]
De Hertogh, Willem [1 ]
Meirte, Jill [1 ]
Deckers, Kristiaan [3 ]
Stassijns, Gaetane [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Rehabil & Physiotherapy, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] GZA Hosp Sint Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
chronic nonspecific low back pain; clinimetric properties; Dutch; Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CLINICAL-PREDICTION RULE; STABILIZATION EXERCISES; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; IDENTIFY PATIENTS; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002304
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study design. Cross-sectional study. Objective. The goal of this study is to translate the English version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (MDQ) into a Dutch version and investigate its clinimetric properties for patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP). Summary of Background Data. Fritz et al (2001) developed a modified version of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI) to assess functional status and named it the MDQ. In this version, a question regarding employment and homemaking ability was substituted for the question related to sex life. Good clinimetric properties for the MDQ were identified but up until now it is not clear whether the clinimetric properties of the MDQ would change if it was translated into a Dutch version. Methods. Translation of the MDQ into Dutch was done in 4 steps. Test-retest reliability was investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) model. Validity was calculated using Pearson correlations and a 2-way analysis of variance for repeated measures. Finally, responsiveness was calculated with the area under the curve (AUC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and the standardized response mean (SRM). Results. A total of 80 completed questionnaires were collected in 3 different hospitals and a total of 43 patients finished a 9 weeks intervention period, completing the retest. Test-retest reliability was excellent with an ICC of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.95). To confirm the convergent validity, the MDQ answered all predefined hypothesises (r = -0.65-0.69/P = 0.01-0.00) and good results for construct validity were found (P = 0.02). The MDQ had an AUC of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.81), an MDC of 8.80 points, and a SRM of 0.65. Conclusion. The Dutch version of the MDQ shows good clinimetric properties and is shown to be usable in the assessment of the functional status of Dutch-speaking patients with nonspecific CLBP.
引用
收藏
页码:E292 / E298
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations
    Aaronson, NK
    Muller, M
    Cohen, PDA
    Essink-Bot, ML
    Fekkes, M
    Sanderman, R
    Sprangers, MAG
    Velde, AT
    Verrips, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) : 1055 - 1068
  • [2] Chapter 4 - European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain
    Airaksinen, O.
    Brox, J. I.
    Cedraschi, C.
    Hildebrandt, J.
    Klaber-Moffett, J.
    Kovacs, F.
    Mannion, A. F.
    Reis, S.
    Staal, J. B.
    Ursin, H.
    Zanoli, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (Suppl 2) : S192 - S300
  • [3] MAPPING PATIENT GOALS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH (ICF): EXAMINING THE CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE LOW BACK PAIN CORE SETS
    Bagraith, Karl S.
    Hayes, Julia
    Strong, Jenny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (05) : 481 - 487
  • [4] Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
    Beaton, DE
    Bombardier, C
    Guillemin, F
    Ferraz, MB
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) : 3186 - 3191
  • [5] MEASURING THE FUNCTIONAL STATUS OF PATIENTS WITH LOW-BACK-PAIN - ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF 4 DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUESTIONNAIRES
    BEURSKENS, AJ
    DEVET, HC
    KOKE, AJ
    VANDERHEIJDEN, GJ
    KNIPSCHILD, PG
    [J]. SPINE, 1995, 20 (09) : 1017 - 1028
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain
    Boonstra, Anne M.
    Schiphorst Preuper, Henrica R.
    Reneman, Michiel F.
    Posthumus, Jitze B.
    Stewart, Roy E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2008, 31 (02) : 165 - 169
  • [7] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Core Strengthening Exercises in Helicopter Crewmembers with Low Back Pain
    Brandt, Yvonne
    Currier, Linda
    Plante, Timothy W.
    Kabban, Christine M. Schubert
    Tvaryanas, Anthony P.
    [J]. AEROSPACE MEDICINE AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2015, 86 (10) : 889 - 894
  • [8] Identifying subgroups of patients with acute/subacute "nonspecific" low back pain - Results of a randomized clinical trial
    Brennan, GP
    Fritz, JM
    Hunter, SJ
    Thackeray, A
    Delitto, A
    Erhard, RE
    [J]. SPINE, 2006, 31 (06) : 623 - 631
  • [9] Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire:: intra class correlation and limits of agreement
    Brouwer, S
    Kuijer, W
    Dijkstra, PU
    Göeken, LNH
    Groothoff, JW
    Geertzen, JHB
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 26 (03): : 162 - 165
  • [10] Effectiveness of an extension-oriented treatment approach in a subgroup of subjects with low back pain: A randomized clinical trial
    Browder, David A.
    Childs, John D.
    Cleland, Joshua A.
    Fritz, Julie M.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2007, 87 (12): : 1608 - 1618