A simple model of pea (Pisum sativum) growth affected by Mycosphaerella pinodes

被引:45
|
作者
Béasse, C
Ney, B [1 ]
Tivoli, B
机构
[1] INRA, INAPG, Unite Agron, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
[2] INRA, Pathol Vegetale Stn, F-35650 Le Rheu, France
关键词
photosynthesis; radiation interception efficiency; radiation use efficiency;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-3059.2000_t01-1-00432.x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The effect of epidemics of Mycosphaerella pinodes on crop growth, radiation interception efficiency (RIE) and radiation use efficiency (RUE) was studied in field conditions and the growth of diseased crop was modelled. Natural epidemics were simulated in field plots by dispersion on the ground of barley grains colonized by the fungus. Growth and leaf area index (LAI) were measured in healthy and diseased plots during the growth season. Epidemics affected crop growth mainly by decreasing RUE, with a slight decrease in RIE. This was probably due to the strong effect of M. pinodes on leaf photosynthesis and the lateness of Mycosphaerella blight epidemics on spring pea, which became serious when the canopy was already formed, thus decreasing RIE only by accelerating the senescence of leaves. The data were used to evaluate the performance of a crop growth model for diseased pea crops. The model comprised the decrease in photosynthesis rate in the leaves, the vertical gradient of disease intensity and the differences in photosynthetic function of the various layers of the canopy. This model, validated over 2 years in the field, accurately simulated the crop growth in diseased plots. Thus the decrease in RUE may be accounted for solely by photosynthesis losses in diseased leaves. This simple model may be used for disease management, defining damage thresholds for chemical application and criteria for tolerant variety selection.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 200
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The proteins of the pea (Pisum Sativum).
    Osborne, TB
    Harris, IF
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1907, 3 (03) : 213 - 217
  • [42] The influence of plant injury on development of Mycosphaerella pinodes in field pea
    Banniza, S
    Vandenberg, A
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYTOPATHOLOGIE, 2003, 25 (03): : 304 - 311
  • [43] Daily and seasonal spore dispersal by Mycosphaerella pinodes and development of mycosphaerella blight of field pea
    Zhang, JX
    Fernando, WGD
    Xue, AG
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 2005, 83 (03): : 302 - 310
  • [44] Genetic resistance to Mycosphaerella pinodes in 558 field pea accessions
    Zhang, Roger
    Hwang, Sheau-Fang
    Chang, Kan-Fa
    Gossen, Bruce D.
    Strelkov, Stephen E.
    Turnbull, George D.
    Blade, Stanford F.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2006, 46 (06) : 2409 - 2414
  • [45] SURVIVAL OF MYCOSPHAERELLA-PINODES ON PEA HAULM BURIED IN SOIL
    SHERIDAN, JJ
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1973, 75 (02) : 195 - 203
  • [46] Effect of pea canopy architecture on splash dispersal of Mycosphaerella pinodes conidia
    Schoeny, A.
    Menat, J.
    Darsonval, A.
    Rouault, F.
    Jumel, S.
    Tivoli, B.
    PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2008, 57 (06) : 1073 - 1085
  • [47] Characterization of field pea (Pisum sativum) resistance against Peyronellaea pinodes and Didymella pinodella that cause ascochyta blight
    Joshi, Sameer
    Pandey, Babu Ram
    Rosewarne, Garry
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [48] SEED YIELD AS AFFECTED BY THE ECOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUM) CULTIVARS
    Kosev, Valentin Ivanov
    BANATS JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 5 (09) : 45 - 50
  • [49] Dry grain yield in rainfed garden pea (Pisum sativum) in relation to environment and management of Mycosphaerella blight
    Bhardwaj, CL
    Thakur, DR
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2000, 70 (04): : 231 - 233
  • [50] Pathogenic variation of western Canadian isolates of Mycosphaerella pinodes on selected Pisum genotypes
    Xue, AG
    Warkentin, TD
    Gossen, BD
    Burnett, PA
    Vandenberg, A
    Rashid, KY
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYTOPATHOLOGIE, 1998, 20 (02): : 189 - 193