Characterization of recovery profiles using gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry for the determination of pesticide residues in meat samples

被引:33
作者
Garrido-Frenich, A.
Romero-Gonzalez, R. [1 ]
Martinez-Vidal, J. L.
Plaza-Bolanos, P.
Cuadros-Rodriguez, L.
Herrera-Abdo, M. A.
机构
[1] Univ Almeria, Dept Analyt Chem, E-04071 Almeria, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Dept Analyt Chem, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[3] Lab Pesticide Residues LAB, Almeria 04009, Spain
关键词
pesticide residues; meat analysis; GC-MS/MS; recovery components; recovery profiles;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2006.08.039
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The assessment of the recovery factor with the analyte concentration in meat samples has been studied for the determination of organochlorine and organophosphoruis pesticides in meat by gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). For that purpose, recent IUPAC recommendations, which distinguishes between two terms, recovery factor and apparent recovery, have been followed. Besides, the systematic error due to the matrix effect has been evaluated by a new term recently proposed, calibration recovery. Recovery profiles were obtained analyzing spiked blank matrix, where the analytes were added before and after the extraction procedure. In a first step, the quantification of the compounds was carried out using a solvent calibration curve. The systematic errors due to the matrix effect during the quantification step and the error due to the sample treatment have been evaluated. Both apparent and calibration recovery components depend on the actual analyte concentration in the sample while the recovery factor remains constant except for analyte concentration close to quantification limit. In addition, the concentration limits, from which an acceptable recovery value (70-110%) can be obtained, are given. If spiked samples are quantified by matrix-matched calibration, the matrix effect is minimized and the calibration recovery component is 100%, and apparent recovery only depends on the recovery factor. The obtained values indicate recovery factor does not depend on the analyte concentration, except for those values closed to quantification limit. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 321
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SANCO102322006
[2]  
AOAC/FAO/IAEA/IUPAC, 1999, GUID SINGL LAB VAL A
[3]  
Barwick VJ, 1999, ANALYST, V124, P981, DOI 10.1039/a901845j
[4]   Use of the terms "recovery" and "apparent recovery" in analytical procedures - (IUPAC recommendations 2002) [J].
Burns, DT ;
Danzer, K ;
Townshend, A .
PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2002, 74 (11) :2201-2205
[5]   Setting up of recovery profiles:: A tool to perform the compliance with recovery requirements for residue analysis [J].
Cuadros-Rodríguez, L ;
Almansa-López, EM ;
García-Campaña, AM ;
González-Casado, A ;
Egea-González, FJ ;
Garrido-Frenich, A ;
Martínez-Vidal, U .
TALANTA, 2005, 66 (04) :1063-1072
[6]   Multiresidue analysis of organochlorine and organophosphorus pesticides in muscle of chicken, pork and lamb by gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry [J].
Frenich, AG ;
Vidal, JLM ;
Sicilia, ADC ;
Rodríguez, MJG ;
Bolaños, PP .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2006, 558 (1-2) :42-52
[7]   Potentiality of gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry in vanguard and rearguard methods of pesticide residues in vegetables [J].
Frenich, AG ;
González-Rodríguez, MJ ;
Arrebola, FJ ;
Vidal, JLM .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 77 (14) :4640-4648
[8]   Establishment of signal-recovery functions for calculation of recovery factor.: Application to monitoring of contaminant residues in vegetables by chemiluminescence detection [J].
Gámiz-Gracia, L ;
Cuadros-Rodríguez, L ;
Soto-Chinchilla, JJ ;
Huertas-Pérez, JF ;
González-Casado, A ;
García-Campaña, A .
ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 384 (01) :295-301
[9]  
GUSTAVOGONZALES A, 1999, TALANTA, V48, P729
[10]   Determination of priority pesticides in baby foods by gas chromatography tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry [J].
Leandro, CC ;
Fussell, RJ ;
Keely, BJ .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2005, 1085 (02) :207-212