Quantifying the cooling efficiency of air velocity by heat loss from skin surface in warm and hot environments

被引:23
作者
Du, Chenqiu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Baizhan [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Hong [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Yifan [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Meilan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Minist Educ, Joint Int Res Lab Green Bldg & Built Environm, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Minist Sci & Technol, Natl Ctr Int Res Low Carbon & Green Bldg, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Warm and hot environments; Air velocity; Thermal responses; Skin heat loss; Cooling efficiency; THERMAL COMFORT; PERSONALIZED VENTILATION; HUMID CLIMATE; HUMAN RESPONSE; MOVEMENT; TEMPERATURE; FLOW; DRAFT; PERCEPTION; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.023
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In warm and hot environments, the possibility of increasing air velocity reduces energy consumption without compromising occupants' thermal comfort; whereas the cooling efficiency pertains to the temperature limits. To address the coupling effect of air velocity and temperature on thermal comfort and evaluate the cooling efficiency objectively, 9 experimental conditions with side air supply (piston flow) were conducted in a well-controlled climate chamber, covering temperatures from warm (28 degrees C) to hot (34 degrees C). Both skin temperatures and questionnaires were measured on 20 subjects. The results showed the cooling efficiency by airflow was significantly affected by temperatures. Subjects' mean skin temperatures(MST) and thermal sensations (TSV) were improved by increasing air velocities when temperature was lower than or equal to 32 degrees C, but no significant differences were found between different air velocities at each temperature level (except for MST at 28 degrees C). The air velocity failed to modify subjects' thermal responses but caused negative thermal and pressure due to higher air temperature and airflow at 34 degrees C. Thanks to the uniform air movement, subjects' total heat loss from skin surface(Q(skin)) was quantified that significantly reduced from 46.98 W/m(2) at 28 degrees C/O m/s, to 31.45 W/m(2) at 34 degrees C/1.4 m/s, indicating the poor cooling efficiency of air velocity in hot environments. The relation between air velocity and temperature with a prerequisite of neutral thermal sensation was obtained based on Q(skin) which can reserve as a reference for air velocity design in warm and hot environments considering thermal comfort, cooling efficiency and energy savings.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 155
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ASHRAE HDB FUND
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ASHRAE Standard 55 - 2013
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, WMA DECL HELS ETH PR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ergonomics of the thermal environment _ Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PHYSIOLOGY
[6]  
Arens E., 2011, THERMAL COMFORT PERC
[7]  
ASHRAE, 2010, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2020
[8]   Real-time determination of optimal indoor-air condition for thermal comfort, air quality and efficient energy usage [J].
Atthajariyakul, S ;
Leephakpreeda, T .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2004, 36 (07) :720-733
[9]  
Brager G.S., 2004, ASHRAE Transactions, V110, P17
[10]   PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLE OF PLEASURE [J].
CABANAC, M .
SCIENCE, 1971, 173 (4002) :1103-+