Farm Animal Cognition-Linking Behavior, Welfare and Ethics

被引:81
|
作者
Nawroth, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Langbein, Jan [1 ]
Coulon, Marjorie [3 ]
Gabor, Vivian [4 ]
Oesterwind, Susann [1 ,5 ]
Benz-Schwarzburg, Judith [6 ]
von Borell, Eberhard [7 ]
机构
[1] Leibn Inst Farm Anim Biol FBN, Inst Behav Physiol, Dummerstorf, Germany
[2] Fed Food Safety & Vet Off, Agroscope Tanikon, Ctr Proper Housing Ruminants & Pigs, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Cabinet EASIER, Clermont Ferrand, France
[4] Univ Goettingen, Dept Anim Sci, Gottingen, Germany
[5] Univ Rostock, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, Rostock, Germany
[6] Univ Vienna, Med Univ Vienna, Unit Eth & Human Anim Studies, Messerli Res Inst,Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna, Austria
[7] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Agr & Nutr Sci, Halle, Germany
关键词
animal ethics; animal behavior; animal welfare; enrichment; human-animal interactions; livestock; physical cognition; social cognition; HORSES EQUUS-CABALLUS; PIGS SUS-SCROFA; MODAL INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION; JUVENILE DOMESTIC PIGS; DWARF GOATS ALTER; HUMAN-GIVEN CUES; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; VISUAL-DISCRIMINATION; MINIATURE PIGS; SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2019.00024
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Farm animal welfare is a major concern for society and food production. To more accurately evaluate animal farming in general and to avoid exposing farm animals to poor welfare situations, it is necessary to understand not only their behavioral but also their cognitive needs and capacities. Thus, general knowledge of how farm animals perceive and interact with their environment is of major importance for a range of stakeholders, from citizens to politicians to cognitive ethologists to philosophers. This review aims to outline the current state of farm animal cognition research and focuses on ungulate livestock species, such as cattle, horses, pigs and small ruminants, and reflects upon a defined set of cognitive capacities (physical cognition: categorization, numerical ability, object permanence, reasoning, tool use; social cognition: individual discrimination and recognition, communication with humans, social learning, attribution of attention, prosociality, fairness). We identify a lack of information on certain aspects of physico-cognitive capacities in most farm animal species, such as numerosity discrimination and object permanence. This leads to further questions on how livestock comprehend their physical environment and understand causal relationships. Increasing our knowledge in this area will facilitate efforts to adjust husbandry systems and enrichment items to meet the needs and preferences of farm animals. Research in the socio-cognitive domain indicates that ungulate livestock possess sophisticated mental capacities, such as the discrimination between, and recognition of, conspecifics as well as human handlers using multiple modalities. Livestock also react to very subtle behavioral cues of conspecifics and humans. These socio-cognitive capacities can impact human-animal interactions during management practices and introduce ethical considerations on how to treat livestock in general. We emphasize the importance of gaining a better understanding of how livestock species interact with their physical and social environments, as this information can improve housing and management conditions and can be used to evaluate the use and treatment of animals during production.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Farm animal welfare: The interaction of ethical questions and animal welfare science
    Sandoe, P
    Christiansen, SB
    Appleby, MC
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2003, 12 (04) : 469 - 478
  • [22] Animal welfare in Austria:: basic concepts of animal ethics, legal framework and animal welfare-related research
    Binder, R
    Palme, R
    Sommerfeld-Stur, I
    Baumgartner, J
    Niebuhr, K
    Zaludik, K
    Bartussek, H
    Waiblinger, S
    Reifinger, M
    Kübber-Heiss, A
    Rabitsch, A
    Gneist, M
    Troxler, J
    WIENER TIERARZTLICHE MONATSSCHRIFT, 2004, 91 : 44 - 58
  • [23] ANIMAL BEHAVIOR AND WELL-BEING SYMPOSIUM: Farm animal welfare assurance: Science and application
    Rushen, J.
    Butterworth, A.
    Swanson, J. C.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (04) : 1219 - 1228
  • [24] Towards Farm Animal Welfare and Sustainability
    Buller, Henry
    Blokhuis, Harry
    Jensen, Per
    Keeling, Linda
    ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (06):
  • [25] Assessment of the impact of government animal welfare policy on farm animal welfare in the UK
    Bennett, RM
    Broom, DM
    Henson, SJ
    Blaney, RJP
    Harper, G
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2004, 13 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [26] Corporate Reporting on Farm Animal Welfare: An Evaluation of Global Food Companies' Discourse and Disclosures on Farm Animal Welfare
    Sullivan, Rory
    Amos, Nicky
    van de Weerd, Heleen A.
    ANIMALS, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [27] Farm Animals Are Long Away from Natural Behavior: Open Questions and Operative Consequences on Animal Welfare
    Cesarani, Alberto
    Pulina, Giuseppe
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (03): : 1 - 14
  • [28] The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare
    Acharya, Rutu Y.
    Hemsworth, Paul H.
    Coleman, Grahame J.
    Kinder, James E.
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [29] The Inseparability of Science and Ethics in Animal Welfare
    Bernard E. Rollin
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2015, 28 : 759 - 765
  • [30] The Inseparability of Science and Ethics in Animal Welfare
    Rollin, Bernard E.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2015, 28 (04) : 759 - 765