Farm Animal Cognition-Linking Behavior, Welfare and Ethics

被引:81
|
作者
Nawroth, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Langbein, Jan [1 ]
Coulon, Marjorie [3 ]
Gabor, Vivian [4 ]
Oesterwind, Susann [1 ,5 ]
Benz-Schwarzburg, Judith [6 ]
von Borell, Eberhard [7 ]
机构
[1] Leibn Inst Farm Anim Biol FBN, Inst Behav Physiol, Dummerstorf, Germany
[2] Fed Food Safety & Vet Off, Agroscope Tanikon, Ctr Proper Housing Ruminants & Pigs, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Cabinet EASIER, Clermont Ferrand, France
[4] Univ Goettingen, Dept Anim Sci, Gottingen, Germany
[5] Univ Rostock, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, Rostock, Germany
[6] Univ Vienna, Med Univ Vienna, Unit Eth & Human Anim Studies, Messerli Res Inst,Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna, Austria
[7] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Agr & Nutr Sci, Halle, Germany
关键词
animal ethics; animal behavior; animal welfare; enrichment; human-animal interactions; livestock; physical cognition; social cognition; HORSES EQUUS-CABALLUS; PIGS SUS-SCROFA; MODAL INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION; JUVENILE DOMESTIC PIGS; DWARF GOATS ALTER; HUMAN-GIVEN CUES; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; VISUAL-DISCRIMINATION; MINIATURE PIGS; SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2019.00024
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Farm animal welfare is a major concern for society and food production. To more accurately evaluate animal farming in general and to avoid exposing farm animals to poor welfare situations, it is necessary to understand not only their behavioral but also their cognitive needs and capacities. Thus, general knowledge of how farm animals perceive and interact with their environment is of major importance for a range of stakeholders, from citizens to politicians to cognitive ethologists to philosophers. This review aims to outline the current state of farm animal cognition research and focuses on ungulate livestock species, such as cattle, horses, pigs and small ruminants, and reflects upon a defined set of cognitive capacities (physical cognition: categorization, numerical ability, object permanence, reasoning, tool use; social cognition: individual discrimination and recognition, communication with humans, social learning, attribution of attention, prosociality, fairness). We identify a lack of information on certain aspects of physico-cognitive capacities in most farm animal species, such as numerosity discrimination and object permanence. This leads to further questions on how livestock comprehend their physical environment and understand causal relationships. Increasing our knowledge in this area will facilitate efforts to adjust husbandry systems and enrichment items to meet the needs and preferences of farm animals. Research in the socio-cognitive domain indicates that ungulate livestock possess sophisticated mental capacities, such as the discrimination between, and recognition of, conspecifics as well as human handlers using multiple modalities. Livestock also react to very subtle behavioral cues of conspecifics and humans. These socio-cognitive capacities can impact human-animal interactions during management practices and introduce ethical considerations on how to treat livestock in general. We emphasize the importance of gaining a better understanding of how livestock species interact with their physical and social environments, as this information can improve housing and management conditions and can be used to evaluate the use and treatment of animals during production.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advances and Perspectives in Farm Animal Learning and Cognition
    Nawroth, Christian
    Langbein, Jan
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2019, 6
  • [2] Assessing ethics and animal welfare in animal biotechnology for farm production
    Kaiser, M
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2005, 24 (01): : 75 - 87
  • [3] Postgraduate teaching in farm animal welfare and ethics
    Lund, V
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 1997, 6 (02) : 105 - 121
  • [4] Behavior Analysis and Farm Animal Welfare
    T. Mary Foster
    William Temple
    Alan Poling
    The Behavior Analyst, 1997, 20 : 87 - 95
  • [5] Behavior analysis and farm animal welfare
    Foster, TM
    Temple, W
    Poling, A
    BEHAVIOR ANALYST, 1997, 20 (02): : 87 - 95
  • [6] The Ethics of a Co-regulatory Model for Farm Animal Welfare Research
    Phillips, C. J. C.
    Petherick, J. C.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2015, 28 (01) : 127 - 142
  • [7] The Ethics of a Co-regulatory Model for Farm Animal Welfare Research
    C. J. C. Phillips
    J. C. Petherick
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2015, 28 : 127 - 142
  • [8] Factors Influencing Individual Variation in Farm Animal Cognition and How to Account for These Statistically
    Bushby, Emily V.
    Friel, Mary
    Goold, Conor
    Gray, Helen
    Smith, Lauren
    Collins, Lisa M.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2018, 5
  • [9] Social behavior in farm animals: Applying fundamental theory to improve animal welfare
    Lee, Victoria E.
    Arnott, Gareth
    Turner, Simon P.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [10] Increasing farm animal welfare by positively motivated instrumental behaviour
    Manteuffel, Gerhard
    Langbein, Jan
    Puppe, Birger
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2009, 118 (3-4) : 191 - 198