Teleosemantics, selection and novel contents

被引:19
作者
Garson, Justin [1 ]
Papineau, David [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Hunter Coll, Dept Philosophy, 695 Pk Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] CUNY, Grad Ctr, Dept Philosophy, 365 5th Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] Kings Coll London, Dept Philosophy, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
Teleosemantics; Biological functions; Selected effects theory; Novel representations; Neural selection; PREDICTION; MECHANISMS; ADDICTION; ACCOUNT;
D O I
10.1007/s10539-019-9689-8
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Mainstream teleosemantics is the view that mental representation should be understood in terms of biological functions, which, in turn, should be understood in terms of selection processes. One of the traditional criticisms of teleosemantics is the problem of novel contents: how can teleosemantics explain our ability to represent properties that are evolutionarily novel? In response, some have argued that by generalizing the notion of a selection process to include phenomena such as operant conditioning, and the neural selection that underlies it, we can resolve this problem. Here, we do four things: we develop this suggestion in a rigorous way through a simple example, we draw on recent neurobiological research to support its empirical plausibility, we defend the move from a host of objections in the literature, and we sketch how the picture can be extended to help us think about more complex conceptual representations and not just perceptual ones.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Teleosemantics without natural selection [J].
Abrams, M .
BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY, 2005, 20 (01) :97-116
[2]   Biological function, adaptation, and natural design [J].
Allen, C ;
Bekoff, M .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1995, 62 (04) :609-622
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1978, ROLE PERCEPT VISUAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Evolution in four dimensions: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Millikan and her critics
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Beyond Concepts: Unicepts, Language, and Natural Information, DOI 10.1093/oso/9780198717195.001.0001
[7]  
Artiga M, 2010, THEORIA-SPAIN, V25, P197
[8]  
Burge Tyler., 2010, ORIGINS OBJECTIVITY, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581405.001.0001
[9]  
Butlin P, 2015, ADDICTION AND CHOICE, P99
[10]   A teleosemantic approach to information in the brain [J].
Cao, Rosa .
BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY, 2012, 27 (01) :49-71