A barrier retractor to reduce surgical site infections and wound disruptions in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

被引:17
作者
Childress, Katherine M. Scolari [1 ]
Gavard, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
Ward, Donald G. [1 ]
Berger, Kinley [1 ]
Gross, Gilad A. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Div Maternal Fetal Med, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
Alexis retractor; barrier retractor; cesarean delivery; obesity; surgical site infections; RISK-FACTORS; UTERINE EXTERIORIZATION; REPAIR; PREVENTION; PROTECTION; SURGERY; CLOSURE; SUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.096
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are an important cause of morbidity following cesarean delivery, particularly in obese patients. Methods to reduce SSIs after cesarean delivery would have an important impact in obese obstetric patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the AlexisO cesarean delivery retractor, a barrier self-retaining retractor, reduces SSIs and wound disruptions in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial of obese women (body mass index >= 30 kg/m(2)) undergoing nonemergent cesarean delivery. Patients were randomized to the treatment group (using the Alexis O cesarean delivery retractor) or to the control group (using conventional handheld retractors). The primary outcome was SSI or wound disruption during the 30 day postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, change in hemoglobin, antiemetic use, length of postoperative hospital stay, hospital readmission, and other postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients were enrolled in the study. One hundred forty-four patients were randomized to the treatment group and 157 to the control group. Baseline characteristics and indications for cesarean delivery were similar between the 2 groups. Median body mass index was 40.1 kg/m(2). There were no significant differences between the treatment and the control group in the primary outcome of SSI or wound disruption rates at the 30 day assessment (20.6% vs 17.6%, P =.62), during the postoperative inpatient hospitalization or at the 1-2 week postoperative visit. There were also no differences in the primary outcome when adjusting for obesity class or thickness of the subcuticular layer. Patients in the treatment group had lower rates of uterine exteriorization (54.3% vs 87.3%, P <.001), but there were no differences in all other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Use of the Alexis retractor in cesarean delivery deliveries did not decrease SSI or wound disruption rates in an obese population. Its use as a retractor should be left to the discretion of the surgeon and clinical circumstances.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient [J].
Alanis, Mark C. ;
Villers, Margaret S. ;
Law, Tameeka L. ;
Steadman, Elizabeth M. ;
Robinson, Christopher J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (03) :271.e1-271.e7
[2]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2010, OBSTET GYNECOL, V116, P792
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Obstet Gynecol, V117, P1472, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182238c31
[4]   National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004 [J].
Cardo, D ;
Horan, T ;
Andrus, M ;
Dembinski, M ;
Edwards, J ;
Peavy, G ;
Tolson, J ;
Wagner, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2004, 32 (08) :470-485
[5]   Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis [J].
Chelmow, D ;
Rodriguez, EJ ;
Sabatimi, MM .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (05) :974-980
[6]   ALEXIS O-Ring wound retractor vs conventional wound protection for the prevention of surgical site infections in colorectal resections [J].
Cheng, K. P. ;
Roslani, A. C. ;
Sehha, N. ;
Kueh, J. H. ;
Law, C. W. ;
Chong, H. Y. ;
Arumugam, K. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (06) :E346-E351
[7]   Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Coutinho, Isabela Cristina ;
de Amorim, Melania Maria Ramos ;
Katz, Leila ;
de Ferraz, Alvaro Antonio Bandeira .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :639-647
[8]   Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review [J].
Dahlke, Joshua D. ;
Mendez-Figueroa, Hector ;
Rouse, Dwight J. ;
Berghella, Vincenzo ;
Baxter, Jason K. ;
Chauhan, Suneet P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (04) :294-306
[9]   Wound Protectors Reduce Surgical Site Infection A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Edwards, Janet P. ;
Ho, Adelyn L. ;
Tee, May C. ;
Dixon, Elijah ;
Ball, Chad G. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (01) :53-59
[10]  
Figueroa D, 2013, OBSTET GYNECOL, V121, P33, DOI [http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827a072c, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827a072c]