Pandapipes: An Open-Source Piping Grid Calculation Package for Multi-Energy Grid Simulations

被引:47
作者
Lohmeier, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Cronbach, Dennis [1 ]
Drauz, Simon Ruben [1 ,2 ]
Braun, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Kneiske, Tanja Manuela [1 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Energy Econ & Energy Syst Technol, Dept Grid Planning & Grid Operat, D-34119 Kassel, Germany
[2] Univ Kassel, Dept Energy Management & Power Syst Operat, D-34121 Kassel, Germany
关键词
sector coupling; gas grid; district heating grid; grid simulation; network analysis; grid operation; open source; multi-energy grids; multi-vector model; hydrogen infrastructure; HEURISTIC OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEM; GAS; FLEXIBILITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su12239899
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increasing complexity of the design and operation evaluation process of multi-energy grids (MEGs) requires tools for the coupled simulation of power, gas and district heating grids. In this work, we analyze a number of applicable tools and find that most of them do not allow coupling of infrastructures, oversimplify the grid model or are based on inaccessible source code. We introduce the open source piping grid simulation tool pandapipes that-in interaction with pandapower-addresses three crucial criteria: clear data structure, adaptable MEG model setup and performance. In an introduction to pandapipes, we illustrate how it fulfills these criteria through its internal structure and demonstrate how it performs in comparison to STANET(R). Then, we show two case studies that have been performed with pandapipes already. The first case study demonstrates a peak shaving strategy as an interaction of a local electricity and district heating grid in a small neighborhood. The second case study analyzes the potential of a power-to-gas device to provide flexibility in a power grid while considering gas grid constraints. These cases show the importance of performing coupled simulations for the design and analysis of future energy infrastructures, as well as why the software should fulfill the three criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 39
页数:39
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Andresen L, 2015, 11 INT MOD C 2015, V118, P695
[2]   Energy Strategies, the Urban Dimension, and Spatial Planning [J].
Asarpota, Karishma ;
Nadin, Vincent .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (14)
[3]   HyFlowA Hybrid Load Flow-Modelling Framework to Evaluate the Effects of Energy Storage and Sector Coupling on the Electrical Load Flows [J].
Boeckl, Benjamin ;
Greiml, Matthias ;
Leitner, Lukas ;
Pichler, Patrick ;
Kriechbaum, Lukas ;
Kienberger, Thomas .
ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (05)
[4]  
Braun M., 2019, P 25 INT C EL DISTR
[5]  
Braun M., 2017, P INT ETG C 2017 BON
[6]  
Brown T., 2018, J. Open Res. Softw., V6, P4, DOI DOI 10.5334/JORS.188
[7]  
Bundesinstitut fur Bau- Stadt- und Raumforschung, BBSR KOMP RAUMB STAD
[8]   Multienergy Systems [J].
Chertkov, Michael ;
Andersson, Goran .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2020, 108 (09) :1387-1391
[9]  
Clees Tanja, 2016, SIMULTECH 2016. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications, P179
[10]   Integrated Electrical and Gas Network Flexibility Assessment in Low-Carbon Multi-Energy Systems [J].
Clegg, Stephen ;
Mancarella, Pierluigi .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2016, 7 (02) :718-731