Systematic comparison of RNA extraction techniques from frozen and fresh lung tissues: checkpoint towards gene expression studies

被引:32
作者
Muyal, Jai Prakash [2 ,5 ]
Muyal, Vandana [2 ]
Kaistha, Brajesh Pratap [3 ]
Seifart, Carola [4 ]
Fehrenbach, Heinz [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Ctr Med & Biosci, Res Ctr Borstel, Sect Expt Pneumol, Borstel, Germany
[2] Univ Marburg, Fac Med, Clin Res Grp Chron Airway Dis, Marburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Giessen & Marburg GmbH, Div Nephrol, Dept Internal Med, Marburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Giessen & Marburg GmbH, Div Resp Med, Dept Internal Med, Marburg Hessen, Germany
[5] Gautam Buddha Univ, Sch Biotechnol, Greater Noida 201308, India
关键词
BREAST-CANCER SAMPLES; QUALITY; PURIFICATION; DEGRADATION; MICROARRAY; CELLS;
D O I
10.1186/1746-1596-4-9
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Background: The reliability of gene expression profiling-based technologies to detect transcriptional differences representative of the original samples is affected by the quality of the extracted RNA. It strictly depends upon the technique that has been employed. Hence, the present study aimed at systematically comparing silica-gel column (SGC) and guanidine isothiocyanate (GTC) techniques of RNA isolation to answer the question which technique is preferable when frozen, long-term stored or fresh lung tissues have to be evaluated for the downstream molecular analysis. Methods: Frozen lungs (n = 3) were prepared by long-term storage (2.5 yrs) in -80 C while fresh lungs (n = 3) were harvested and processed immediately. The purity and quantification of RNA was determined with a spectrophotometer whereas the total amounted copy numbers of target sequences were determined with iCycler detection system for assessment of RNA intactness (28S and 18S) and fragment sizes, i.e. short (GAPDH-3' UTR), medium (GAPDH), and long (PBGD) with 200 bp, 700 bp, and 1400 bp distance to the 3' ends of mRNA motif, respectively. Results: Total yield of RNA was higher with GTC than SGC technique in frozen as well as fresh tissues while the purity of RNA remained comparable. The quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction data revealed that higher mean copy numbers of 28S and a longer fragment (1400 bp) were obtained from RNA isolated with SGC than GTC technique using fresh as well as frozen tissues. Additionally, a high mean copy number of 18S and medium fragment (700 bp) were obtained in RNA isolated with SGC technique from fresh tissues, only. For the shorter fragment, no significant differences between both techniques were noticed. Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that although the GTC technique has yielded a higher amount of RNA, the SGC technique was much more superior with respect to the reliable generation of an intact RNA and effectively amplified longer products in fresh as well as in frozen tissues.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Methodological considerations for gene expression profiling of human brain
    Atz, Mary
    Walsh, David
    Cartagena, Preston
    Li, Jun
    Evans, Simon
    Choudary, Prabhakara
    Overman, Kevin
    Stein, Richard
    Tomita, Hiro
    Potkin, Steven
    Myers, Rick
    Watson, Stanley J.
    Jones, E. G.
    Akil, Huda
    Bunney, William E., Jr.
    Vawter, Marquis P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2007, 163 (02) : 295 - 309
  • [2] BONINI JA, 1991, BIOTECHNIQUES, V11, P708
  • [3] BRISCOE PR, 1991, BIOTECHNIQUES, V10, P594
  • [4] DNA chip technology in brain banks: Confronting a degrading world
    Buesa, C
    Maes, T
    Subirada, F
    Barrachina, M
    Ferrer, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPATHOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2004, 63 (10) : 1003 - 1014
  • [5] A microarray study of post-mortem mRNA degradation in mouse brain tissue
    Catts, VS
    Catts, SV
    Fernandez, HR
    Taylor, JM
    Coulson, EJ
    Lutze-Mann, LH
    [J]. MOLECULAR BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 138 (02): : 164 - 177
  • [6] CHOMCZYNSKI P, 1987, ANAL BIOCHEM, V162, P156, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2
  • [7] Impact of RNA degradation on gene expression profiles:: Assessment of different methods to reliably determine RNA quality
    Copois, Virginie
    Bibeau, Frederic
    Bascoul-Mollevi, Caroline
    Salvetat, Nicolas
    Chalbos, Patrick
    Bareil, Corinne
    Candeil, Laurent
    Fraslon, Caroline
    Conseiller, Emmanuel
    Granci, Virginie
    Maziere, Pierre
    Kramar, Andrew
    Ychou, Marc
    Pau, Bernard
    Martineau, Pierre
    Molina, Franck
    Del Rio, Maguy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 127 (04) : 549 - 559
  • [8] A highly reproducible, linear, and automated sample preparation method for DNA microarrays
    Dorris, DR
    Ramakrishnan, R
    Trakas, D
    Dudzik, F
    Belval, R
    Zhao, C
    Nguyen, A
    Domanus, M
    Mazumder, A
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (06) : 976 - 984
  • [9] Evaluation of quality-control criteria for microarray gene expression analysis
    Dumur, CI
    Nasim, S
    Best, IM
    Archer, KJ
    Ladd, AC
    Mas, VR
    Wilkinson, DS
    Garrett, CT
    Ferreira-Gonzales, A
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 50 (11) : 1994 - 2002
  • [10] Immuno-LCM: Laser capture microdissection of immunostained frozen sections for mRNA analysis
    Fend, F
    Emmert-Buck, MR
    Chuaqui, R
    Cole, K
    Lee, J
    Liotta, LA
    Raffeld, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1999, 154 (01) : 61 - 66