A Practitioner Model for Increasing Eye Contact in Children With Autism

被引:32
作者
Cook, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Rapp, John T. [3 ]
Mann, Kathryn R. [2 ]
McHugh, Catherine [2 ]
Burji, Carla [2 ]
Nuta, Raluca [2 ]
机构
[1] Monarch House, Clin Serv & Res, Oakville, ON, Canada
[2] Monarch House, Oakville, ON, Canada
[3] Auburn Univ, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
attending; autism spectrum disorder; eye contact; instructional control; PERCENTILE SCHEDULES; BEHAVIORAL CUSPS; REINFORCEMENT; INTERVENTION; ATTENTION; INDIVIDUALS; PREFERENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0145445516689323
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although many teaching techniques for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) require the instructor to gain the child's eye contact prior to delivering an instructional demand, the literature contains notably few procedures that reliably produce this outcome. To address this problem, we evaluated the effects of a sequential model for increasing eye contact in children with ASD. The model included the following phases: contingent praise only (for eye contact), contingent edibles plus praise, stimulus prompts plus contingent edibles and praise, contingent video and praise, schedule thinning, and maintenance evaluations for up to 2 years. Results indicated that the procedures increased eye contact for 20 participants (one additional participant did not require consequences). For 16 participants, praise (alone) was not sufficient to support eye contact; however, high levels of eye contact were typically maintained with these participants when therapists used combined schedules of intermittent edibles or video and continuous praise. We discuss some limitations of this model and directions for future research on increasing eye contact for children with ASD.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 404
页数:23
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   INCREASING EYE CONTACT BY HEAD-HOLDING [J].
ALTMAN, K ;
KRUPSAW, R .
ANALYSIS AND INTERVENTION IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 1982, 2 (04) :319-327
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, V5th ed, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], S 35 ANN CONV ASS BE
[5]  
[Anonymous], OURNAL APPL BEHAV AN
[6]   Generating varmble and random schedules of reinforcement using Microsoft Excel marcros [J].
Bancroft, Stacie L. ;
Bourret, Jason C. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2008, 41 (02) :227-235
[7]   Behavioral cusps: A model for selecting target behaviors [J].
Bosch, S ;
Fuqua, RW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2001, 34 (01) :123-125
[8]   Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers [J].
Bowman, LG ;
Piazza, CC ;
Fisher, WW ;
Hagopian, LP ;
Kogan, JS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1997, 30 (03) :451-458
[9]   Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context [J].
Carr, JE ;
Nicolson, AC ;
Higbee, TS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2000, 33 (03) :353-357
[10]  
Carter MJ, 2014, THER RECREAT J, V48, P275