Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic (DCE-US) assessment of the early response after combined gemcitabine and HIFU with low-power treatment for the mouse xenograft model of human pancreatic cancer

被引:16
作者
Kim, Jung Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Haeri [1 ]
Kim, Young Jae [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jae Young [1 ]
Han, Joon Koo [1 ]
Choi, Byung-Ihn [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Inst Radiat Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Soonchunhyang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Gemcitabine; Ultrasonography; Perfusion; FOCUSED ULTRASOUND THERAPY; HIGH-INTENSITY; CARCINOMA; HISTOTRIPSY; CAVITATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-014-3260-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To assess therapeutic efficacy of gemcitabine and HIFU for a mouse model of pancreatic cancer, and the role of DCE-US for predicting early treatment response compared with pathology. In 48 PANC-1- nude mice (G1, HIFU_higher power [n = 14]; G2, gemcitabine [n = 12]; G3, combined gemcitabine and HIFU_low power [n = 12]; and G4, control [n = 10]), pulsed HIFU or gemcitabine therapy was used. DCE-US was performed 1 day before and after first treatment. Seven DCE-US perfusion parameters were obtained. Therapeutic efficacy was estimated using necrotic fraction and apoptosis. Correlation between tumour size and US perfusion parameters was analysed. Pathology results showed that combined gemcitabine and HIFU using low-power treatment had a more effective response than other treatments, including in the control group, i.e. necrotic fraction: 40.5 +/- 4.9 vs. 16.9 +/- 8.0, p = 0.000 and apoptosis: 44.3 +/- 29.4 vs. 7.9 +/- 4.9, p = 0.002. In this group, US perfusion parameters, including peak intensity (22.6 +/- 22.6 vs. 9.6 +/- 6.3, p = 0.002), AUC (961.8 +/- 96.9 vs. 884.4 +/- 91.4, p = 0.000), and AUC(out) (799.9 +/- 75.6 vs. 747.1 +/- 77.9, p = 0.000), had significantly decreased 1 day following first treatment (p < 0.05). In addition, peak intensity, AUC, and AUC(out) showed a tendency to decrease in treated groups. Alternatively, peak intensity, AUC, and AUC(out) showed a tendency to increase in control group. Gemcitabine and HIFU were more effective and safer than other treatments. US perfusion parameters were useful for predicting early therapeutic response 1 day following treatment. aEuro cent Recently, treatment of pancreatic cancer has changed based on a multidisciplinary approach. aEuro cent Combined gemcitabine_HIFU demonstrated more effective therapeutic response than other treatments. aEuro cent DCE-US is useful for predicting early therapeutic response 1 day after treatment. aEuro cent In the combined group, PI, AUC, and AUC (out) decreased 1 day after treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:2059 / 2068
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial
    Burris, HA
    Moore, MJ
    Andersen, J
    Green, MR
    Rothenberg, ML
    Madiano, MR
    Cripps, MC
    Portenoy, RK
    Storniolo, AM
    Tarassoff, P
    Nelson, R
    Dorr, FA
    Stephens, CD
    VanHoff, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (06) : 2403 - 2413
  • [2] Spatial-temporal dynamics of cavitation bubble clouds in 1.2 MHz focused ultrasound field
    Chen, Hong
    Li, Xiaojing
    Wan, Mingxi
    [J]. ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 13 (06) : 480 - 486
  • [3] Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)
    Coussios, C. C.
    Farny, C. H.
    Ter Haar, G.
    Roy, R. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2007, 23 (02) : 105 - 120
  • [4] Quantitative evaluation of microvascular blood flow by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)
    Greis, Christian
    [J]. CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2011, 49 (1-4) : 137 - 149
  • [5] INVESTIGATIONS INTO PULSED HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND-ENHANCED DELIVERY: PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE FOR A NOVEL MECHANISM
    Hancock, Hilary A.
    Smith, Lauren H.
    Cuesta, Julian
    Durrani, Amir K.
    Angstadt, Mary
    Palmeri, Mark L.
    Kimmel, Eitan
    Frenkel, Victor
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 35 (10) : 1722 - 1736
  • [6] Sonographic Assessment of Tumor Response From In Vivo Models to Clinical Applications
    Hwang, Misun
    Niermann, Kenneth J.
    Lyshchik, Andrej
    Fleischer, Arthur C.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2009, 25 (04) : 175 - 183
  • [7] HIFU for palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer
    Khokhlova, Tatiana D.
    Hwang, Joo Ha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 2 (03) : 175 - 184
  • [8] Refining histotripsy: Defining the parameter space for the creation of nonthermal lesions with high intensity, pulsed focused ultrasound of the in vitro kidney
    Kieran, Kathleen
    Hall, Timothy L.
    Parsons, Jessica E.
    Wolf, J. Stuart, Jr.
    Fowlkes, J. Brian
    Cain, Charles A.
    Roberts, William W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (02) : 672 - 676
  • [9] Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Early Evaluation of Response to Bevacizumab Therapy at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced US with Quantification-Preliminary Results
    Lassau, Nathalie
    Koscielny, Serge
    Chami, Linda
    Chebil, Mohamed
    Benatsou, Baya
    Roche, Alain
    Ducreux, Michel
    Malka, David
    Boige, Valerie
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 258 (01) : 291 - 300
  • [10] Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Sunitinib: Early Evaluation of Treatment Response Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
    Lassau, Nathalie
    Koscielny, Serge
    Albiges, Laurence
    Chami, Linda
    Benatsou, Baya
    Chebil, Mohamed
    Roche, Alain
    Escudier, Bernard J.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (04) : 1216 - 1225