Telehealth Personalized Cancer Risk Communication to Motivate Colonoscopy in Relatives of Patients With Colorectal Cancer: The Family CARE Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:64
作者
Kinney, Anita Y. [1 ,2 ,10 ,11 ]
Boonyasiriwat, Watcharaporn [4 ]
Walters, Scott T. [5 ]
Pappas, Lisa M. [2 ]
Stroup, Antoinette M. [1 ,2 ]
Schwartz, Marc D. [7 ,8 ]
Edwards, Sandra L. [1 ,2 ]
Rogers, Amy [2 ]
Kohlmann, Wendy K. [2 ]
Boucher, Kenneth M. [1 ,2 ]
Vernon, Sally W. [6 ]
Simmons, Rebecca G. [2 ]
Lowery, Jan T. [9 ]
Flores, Kristina [10 ]
Wiggins, Charles L. [10 ,11 ]
Hill, Deirdre A. [10 ,11 ]
Burt, Randall W. [1 ,2 ]
Williams, Marc S. [3 ,12 ]
Higginbotham, John C. [13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Intermt Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Chulalongkorn Univ, Bangkok, Thailand
[5] Univ N Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr Ft Worth, Sch Publ Hlth, Ft Worth, TX USA
[6] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX USA
[7] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[8] Georgetown Univ, Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[9] Univ Colorado, Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[10] Univ New Mexico, Ctr Canc, Albuquerque, NM 87108 USA
[11] Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[12] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Genom Med Inst, Danville, PA USA
[13] Univ Alabama, Coll Community Hlth Sci, Community & Rural Med Inst Rural Hlth Res, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
关键词
1ST-DEGREE RELATIVES; COLON-CANCER; HEALTH-PROMOTION; LYNCH-SYNDROME; HISTORY; INTERVENTION; POPULATION; SURVEILLANCE; INDIVIDUALS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2013.51.6765
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The rate of adherence to regular colonoscopy screening in individuals at increased familial risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is suboptimal, especially among rural and other geographically underserved populations. Remote interventions may overcome geographic and system-level barriers. We compared the efficacy of a telehealth-based personalized risk assessment and communication intervention with a mailed educational brochure for improving colonoscopy screening among at-risk relatives of patients with CRC. Methods Eligible individuals age 30 to 74 years who were not up-to-date with risk-appropriate screening and were not candidates for genetic testing were recruited after contacting patients with CRC or their next of kin in five states. Enrollees were randomly assigned as family units to either an active, personalized intervention that incorporated evidence-based risk communication and behavior change techniques, or a mailed educational brochure. The primary outcome was medically verified colonoscopy within 9 months of the intervention. Results Of the 481 eligible and randomly assigned at-risk relatives, 79.8% completed the outcome assessments within 9 months; 35.4% of those in the personalized intervention group and 15.7% of those in the comparison group obtained a colonoscopy. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the telehealth group was almost three times as likely to get screened as the low-intensity comparison group (odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.87 to 4.28; P < .001). Persons residing in rural areas and those with lower incomes benefitted at the same level as did urban residents. Conclusion Remote personalized interventions that consider family history and incorporate evidence-based risk communication and behavior change strategies may promote risk-appropriate screening in close relatives of patients with CRC.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society, 2011, AM CANC SOC REC COL
[2]   Rural vs Urban Residence Affects Risk-Appropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening [J].
Anderson, Allison E. ;
Henry, Kevin A. ;
Samadder, N. Jewel ;
Merrill, Ray M. ;
Kinney, Anita Y. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 11 (05) :526-533
[3]  
Anton-Culver Hoda, 2003, Community Genet, V6, P171, DOI 10.1159/000078165
[4]   Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States [J].
Beydoun, Hind A. ;
Beydoun, May A. .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2008, 19 (04) :339-359
[5]   Colorectal Cancer Screening [J].
Burt, Randall W. ;
Barthel, James S. ;
Dunn, Kelli Bullard ;
David, Donald S. ;
Drelichman, Ernesto ;
Ford, James M. ;
Giardiello, Francis M. ;
Gruber, Stephen B. ;
Halverson, Amy L. ;
Hamilton, Stanley R. ;
Ismail, Mohammad K. ;
Jasperson, Kory ;
Lazenby, Audrey J. ;
Lynch, Patrick M. ;
Martin, Edward W., Jr. ;
Mayer, Robert J. ;
Ness, Reid M. ;
Provenzale, Dawn ;
Rao, M. Sambasiva ;
Shike, Moshe ;
Steinbach, Gideon ;
Terdiman, Jonathan P. ;
Weinberg, David .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2010, 8 (01) :8-61
[6]   Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: A meta-analysis [J].
Butterworth, AS ;
Higgins, JPT ;
Pharoah, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (02) :216-227
[7]   Using tailored telephone counseling to accelerate the adoption of colorectal cancer screening [J].
Costanza, Mary E. ;
Luckmann, Roger ;
Stoddard, Anne M. ;
White, Mary Jo ;
Stark, Jennifer R. ;
Avrunin, Jill S. ;
Rosal, Milagros C. ;
Clernow, Lynn .
CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 2007, 31 (03) :191-198
[8]   A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients [J].
Courtney, Ryan J. ;
Paul, Christine L. ;
Carey, Mariko L. ;
Sanson-Fisher, Robert W. ;
Macrae, Finlay A. ;
D'Este, Catherine ;
Hill, David ;
Barker, Daniel ;
Simmons, Jody .
BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
[9]   Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance [J].
Craig, Peter ;
Dieppe, Paul ;
Macintyre, Sally ;
Michie, Susan ;
Nazareth, Irwin ;
Petticrew, Mark .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7676) :979-983
[10]  
Dillman D.A., 2009, Internet, Mail, and Mix-Mode Surveys: The Taylored Design Method