Incorporating patients' preferences in the value assessment of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: a narrative review

被引:2
|
作者
Ngorsuraches, Surachat [1 ]
Poudel, Nabin [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Harrison Sch Pharm, Dept Hlth Outcomes Res & Policy, 4306a Walker Bldg, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
Cost-effectiveness analysis; disease-modifying therapies; multiple sclerosis; patients’ preferences; value assessment; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; REAL-WORLD ADHERENCE; GLATIRAMER ACETATE; INTERFERON BETA-1A; DIMETHYL FUMARATE; FINGOLIMOD; DRUGS; NATALIZUMAB; ALEMTUZUMAB;
D O I
10.1080/14737167.2021.1880321
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Despite the increasing role of patients in the US healthcare system, patients have yet been engaged in the value assessment of their treatments, including disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). The objectives of this review were therefore to summarize existing studies on cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and patients' preferences of DMTs for MS, and to discuss how to incorporate patients' preferences into the value assessment of DMTs. Area covered: We reviewed previous systematic reviews and conducted further search until November 2020 for studies on CEA with QALYs and patients' preferences of DMTs for MS. We identified the outcomes that were assessed or valued in the CEA studies and the DMT attributes that were important to patients with MS. Expert opinion: Our literature review showed that the studies using CEA with QALYs failed to capture some important DMT attributes, e.g., route and frequency of administration, identified in the studies on the patients' preferences. Various approaches were available for incorporating the patients' preferences in the value assessment of DMTs for MS. We supported this incorporation, which subsequently would increase patient access to preferred DMTs.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 195
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiple sclerosis patients' understanding and preferences for risks and benefits of disease-modifying drugs: A systematic review
    Reen, Gurpreet K.
    Silber, Eli
    Langdon, Dawn W.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 375 : 107 - 122
  • [42] Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis
    Higuera, Lucas
    Carlin, Caroline S.
    Anderson, Sarah
    Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 2016, 22 (12) : 1394 - 1401
  • [43] Update on disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis
    Vargas, Diana L.
    Tyor, William R.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 65 (05) : 883 - 891
  • [44] Factors affecting adherence to disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: systematic review
    Washington, Francesca
    Langdon, Dawn
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 269 (04) : 1861 - 1872
  • [45] Disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis. State of the art and perspectives
    Magy, L.
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2022, 206 (06): : 741 - 751
  • [46] Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis
    Kim, Woojun
    Zandona, Manuella Edler
    Kim, Su-Hyun
    Kim, Ho Jin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY, 2015, 11 (01): : 9 - 19
  • [47] Experience in Multiple Sclerosis Patients with COVID-19 and Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Review of 873 Published Cases
    Moehn, Nora
    Konen, Franz E.
    Pul, Refik
    Kleinschnitz, Christoph
    Pruss, Harald
    Witte, Torsten
    Stangel, Martin
    Skripuletz, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 12
  • [48] Multiple sclerosis hospitalizations among users of oral disease-modifying therapies
    Nguyen, Thanh Phuong Pham
    Jacobs, Dina
    Thibault, Dylan
    Willis, Allison W.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2021, 52
  • [49] Update on Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis
    Carrithers, Michael D.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 36 (12) : 1938 - 1945
  • [50] Current Disease-Modifying Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis
    Derwenskus, Joy
    MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 78 (02): : 161 - 175