Effects of Statistical Models and Items Difficulties on Making Trait-Level Inferences: A Simulation Study

被引:5
作者
Hauck Filho, Nelson [1 ]
Machado, Wagner de Lara [2 ]
Damasio, Bruno Figueiredo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Francisco, BR-13251900 Itatiba, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源
PSICOLOGIA-REFLEXAO E CRITICA | 2014年 / 27卷 / 04期
关键词
Psychometrics; Item Response Theory; Classical Test Theory; factor analysis; data simulation; latent variable models; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; CLASSICAL TEST THEORY; FACTOR SCORES; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1590/1678-7153.201427407
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Researchers dealing with the task of estimating locations of individuals on continuous latent variables may rely on several statistical models described in the literature. However, weighting costs and benefits of using one specific model over alternative models depends on empirical information that is not always clearly available. Therefore, the aim of this simulation study was to compare the performance of seven popular statistical models in providing adequate latent trait estimates in conditions of items difficulties targeted at the sample mean or at the tails of the latent trait distribution. Results suggested an overall tendency of models to provide more accurate estimates of true latent scores when using items targeted at the sample mean of the latent trait distribution. Rating Scale Model, Graded Response Model, and Weighted Least Squares Mean-and Variance-adjusted Confirmatory Factor Analysis yielded the most reliable latent trait estimates, even when applied to inadequate items for the sample distribution of the latent variable. These findings have important implications concerning some popular methodological practices in Psychology and related areas.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / 678
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul [J].
Allen, Jim ;
O'Connell, James F. .
ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) :1-14
[2]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Mplus user's guide
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Journal of Statistical Software, DOI DOI 10.18637/JSS.V017.I05
[5]  
Aryadoust S.V., 2009, Rasch Measurement Transactions, V23, P1207
[6]  
Baker F., 2001, BASICS ITEM RESPONSE
[7]   Using classical test theory in combination with item response theory [J].
Bechger, TM ;
Maris, G ;
Verstralen, HHFM ;
Béguin, AA .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 27 (05) :319-334
[8]   MARGINAL MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF ITEM PARAMETERS - APPLICATION OF AN EM ALGORITHM [J].
BOCK, RD ;
AITKIN, M .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1981, 46 (04) :443-459
[9]   Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences [J].
Bollen, KA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 53 :605-634
[10]  
Bond T. G., 2020, Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, V4th ed.