Caring for the circle of life: wildlife rehabilitation and sanctuary care

被引:0
作者
Perry, Donna J. [1 ]
Averka, Jacob R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Grad Sch Nursing, Med Sch, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
来源
HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS | 2020年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
caregivers; conservation; human-wildlife coexistence; Maine; Massachusetts; New Hampshire; wildlife; wildlife rehabilitation; wildlife sanctuary; TRANSFORMATION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In the United States alone, there are >5,000 state-licensed wildlife rehabilitators in addition to a multitude of other wildlife caregivers across rehabilitation and sanctuary settings. Wildlife rehabilitation and sanctuary care provide a unique lens from which to explore human-wildlife interactions. We examined the experiences of wildlife caregivers within a continuum of acute veterinary services, community-based rehabilitation, and sanctuary care to gain insight into wildlife caregiving and its implications for human-wildlife coexistence. Between 2016 and 2018, we completed in-depth interviews with 15 wildlife caretakers in Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire, USA. In addition to the interviews, we observed 197 unique human-animal interactions during wildlife care. The overarching paradigm that emerged from our research was what we refer to as "caring for the circle of life." Embraced within this paradigm were 5 themes: (1) entering and persevering in the circle of care; (2) honoring natural processes; (3) knowing and being known by the wild creature; (4) extending the circle of care; and (5) fulfillment. Wildlife rehabilitation and sanctuary care, in addition to providing medical assistance to animals in need, advance knowledge about individual species and contributes to increased public awareness regarding wildlife conservation and human-wildlife coexistence.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 324
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Immediate and Sustained Skin-to-Skin Contact for the Healthy Term Newborn After Birth: AWHONN Practice Brief Number 5 [J].
不详 .
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2016, 45 (06) :842-844
[2]  
Bordewieck N, 2015, WILDLIFE REHABILITAT
[3]  
Chivian E., 2008, Sustaining life: how human health depends on biodiversity
[4]  
Conover MR, 2019, HUM-WILDL INTERACT, V13, P264
[5]  
Creswell JW, 2018, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches
[6]  
deGraaf R.M., 2001, NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE
[7]   Suburban wildlife: Lessons, challenges, and opportunities [J].
Destefano S. ;
Deblinger R.D. ;
Miller C. .
Urban Ecosystems, 2005, 8 (2) :131-137
[8]  
Doyle C., 2017, Animal Studies Journal, V6, P55
[9]   Employing a Machine Learning Approach to Detect Combined Internet of Things Attacks against Two Objective Functions Using a Novel Dataset [J].
Foley, John ;
Moradpoor, Naghmeh ;
Ochenyi, Henry .
SECURITY AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, 2020, 2020
[10]   Human-Wildlife Conflicts and the Need to Include Tolerance and Coexistence: An Introductory Comment [J].
Frank, Beatrice .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2016, 29 (06) :738-743