Improved decision making for prioritizing tumor targeting antibodies in human xenografts: Utility of fluorescence imaging to verify tumor target expression, antibody binding and optimization of dosage and application schedule

被引:3
作者
Dobosz, Michael [1 ]
Haupt, Ute [1 ]
Scheuer, Werner [1 ]
机构
[1] Roche Innovat Ctr Munich, Discovery Oncol, Pharmaceut Res & Early Dev, Penzberg, Germany
关键词
Antibody development; antigen expression; cancer; immunohistochemistry; In vivo histology; multispectral fluorescence imaging; optical Imaging; tumor-target evaluation;
D O I
10.1080/19420862.2016.1238996
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Preclinical efficacy studies of antibodies targeting a tumor-associated antigen are only justified when the expression of the relevant antigen has been demonstrated. Conventionally, antigen expression level is examined by immunohistochemistry of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue section. This method represents the diagnostic "gold standard" for tumor target evaluation, but is affected by a number of factors, such as epitope masking and insufficient antigen retrieval. As a consequence, variances and discrepancies in histological staining results can occur, which may influence decision-making and therapeutic outcome. To overcome these problems, we have used different fluorescence-labeled therapeutic antibodies targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family members and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) in combination with fluorescence imaging modalities to determine tumor antigen expression, drug-target interaction, and biodistribution and tumor saturation kinetics in non-small cell lung cancer xenografts. For this, whole-body fluorescence intensities of labeled antibodies, applied as a single compound or antibody mixture, were measured in Calu-1 and Calu-3 tumor-bearing mice, then ex vivo multispectral tumor tissue analysis at microscopic resolution was performed. With the aid of this simple and fast imaging method, we were able to analyze the tumor cell receptor status of HER1-3 and IGF1R, monitor the antibody-target interaction and evaluate the receptor binding sites of anti-HER2-targeting antibodies. Based on this, the most suitable tumor model, best therapeutic antibody, and optimal treatment dosage and application schedule was selected. Predictions drawn from obtained imaging data were in excellent concordance with outcome of conducted preclinical efficacy studies. Our results clearly demonstrate the great potential of combined in vivo and ex vivo fluorescence imaging for the preclinical development and characterization of monoclonal antibodies.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 153
页数:14
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Shuptrine C.W., Surana R., Weiner L.M., Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of cancer, Semin Cancer Biol, 22, pp. 3-13, (2012)
[2]  
Scott A.M., Wolchok J.D., Old L.J., Antibody therapy of cancer, Nat Rev Cancer, 12, pp. 278-287, (2012)
[3]  
Reichert J.M., Antibodies to watch in 2015, Mabs, 7, pp. 1-8, (2015)
[4]  
Reichert J.M., Antibodies to watch in 2016, Mabs, 8, pp. 197-204, (2016)
[5]  
Diamandis M., White N.M.A., Yousef G.M., Personalized Medicine: Marking a New Epoch in Cancer Patient Management, Mol Cancer Res, 8, pp. 1175-1187, (2010)
[6]  
Duffy M.J., Crown J., Companion biomarkers: paving the pathway to personalized treatment for Cancer, Clin Chem, 59, pp. 1447-1456, (2013)
[7]  
Kalia M., Personalized oncology: Recent advances and future challenges, Metab-Clin Exp, 62, pp. S11-S4, (2013)
[8]  
Kalia M., Biomarkers for personalized oncology: recent advances and future challenges, Metab-Clin Exp, 64, pp. S16-S21, (2015)
[9]  
Bussolati G., Leonardo E., Technical pitfalls potentially affecting diagnoses in immunohistochemistry, J Clin Pathol, 61, pp. 1184-1192, (2008)
[10]  
Anagnostou V.K., Welsh A.W., Giltnane J.M., Siddiqui S., Liceaga C., Gustavson M., Syrigos K.N., Reiter J.L., Rimm D.L., Analytic variability in immunohistochemistry biomarker studies, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 19, pp. 982-991, (2010)