Estimation of shear wave speed in the human uterine cervix

被引:79
作者
Carlson, L. C. [1 ]
Feltovich, H. [1 ,2 ]
Palmeri, M. L. [3 ]
Dahl, J. J. [3 ]
Munoz del Rio, A. [1 ]
Hall, T. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI 53726 USA
[2] Intermt Healthcare, Maternal Fetal Med Dept, Provo, UT USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27706 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cervix; preterm birth; shear wave speed; ultrasound; PRETERM BIRTH; CONNECTIVE-TISSUE; COLLAGEN DEGRADATION; WATER-CONTENT; PREGNANCY; PROGESTERONE; PARTURITION; PREVENTION; INDUCTION; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1002/uog.12555
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To explore spatial variability within the cervix and the sensitivity of shear wave speed (SWS) to assess softness/stiffness differences in ripened (softened) vs unripened tissue. Methods We obtained SWS estimates from hysterectomy specimens (n=22), a subset of which were ripened (n=13). Multiple measurements were made longitudinally along the cervical canal on both the anterior and posterior sides of the cervix. Statistical tests of differences in the proximal vs distal, anterior vs posterior and ripened vs unripened cervix were performed with individual two-sample t-tests and a linear mixed model. Results Estimates of SWS increase monotonically from distal to proximal longitudinally along the cervix, they vary in the anterior compared to the posterior cervix and they are significantly different in ripened vs unripened cervical tissue. Specifically, the mid position SWS estimates for the unripened group were 3.45 +/- 0.95 m/s (anterior; mean +/- SD) and 3.56 +/- 0.92 m/s (posterior), and 2.11 +/- 0.45 m/s (anterior) and 2.68 +/- 0.57 m/s (posterior) for the ripened group (P<0.001). Conclusions We propose that SWS estimation may be a valuable research and, ultimately, diagnostic tool for objective quantification of cervical stiffness/softness. Copyright (C) 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 458
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Second harmonic generation imaging as a potential tool for staging pregnancy and predicting preterm birth
    Akins, Meredith L.
    Luby-Phelps, Katherine
    Mahendroo, Mala
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2010, 15 (02)
  • [2] Allen Rebecca, 2009, Rev Obstet Gynecol, V2, P159
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, Prostaglandins and the Reproductive Cycle, DOI DOI 10.3843/GLOWM.10314
  • [4] ASPDEN RM, 1988, COLLAGEN REL RES, V8, P103
  • [5] The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity
    Beck, Stacy
    Wojdyla, Daniel
    Say, Lale
    Betran, Ana Pilar
    Merialdi, Mario
    Requejo, Jennifer Harris
    Rubens, Craig
    Menon, Ramkumar
    Van Look, Paul F. A.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2010, 88 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [6] Image Quality, Tissue Heating, and Frame Rate Trade-offs in Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging
    Bouchard, Richard R.
    Dahl, Jeremy J.
    Hsu, Stephen J.
    Palmeri, Mark L.
    Trahey, Gregg E.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2009, 56 (01) : 63 - 76
  • [7] Changes in water content, collagen degradation, collagen content, and concentration in repeated biopsies of the cervix of pregnant cows
    Breeveld-Dwarkasing, VNA
    Koppele, JMT
    Bank, RA
    van der Weijden, GC
    Taverne, MAM
    van Dissel-Emiliani, FMF
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2003, 69 (05) : 1608 - 1614
  • [8] Regional differences in water content, collagen content, and collagen degradation in the cervix of nonpregnant cows
    Breeveld-Dwarkasing, VNA
    de Boer-Brouwer, M
    Koppele, JMT
    Bank, RA
    van der Weijden, GC
    Taverne, MAM
    van Dissel-Emiliani, FMF
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2003, 69 (05) : 1600 - 1607
  • [9] Chan W Y, 1980, Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane Res, V8, P1443
  • [10] Mifepristone-induced cervical ripening: Structural, biomechanical, and molecular events
    Clark, K
    Ji, HL
    Feltovich, H
    Janowski, J
    Carroll, C
    Chien, EK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (05) : 1391 - 1398