Gas composition tracking in transient pipeline flow

被引:41
作者
Chaczykowski, Maciej [1 ]
Sund, Filip [2 ,3 ]
Zarodkiewicz, Pawel [4 ]
Hope, Sigmund Mongstad [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Univ Technol, Dist Heating & Nat Gas Syst Div, PL-00653 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[3] Uni Res Polytec, N-5527 Haugesund, Norway
[4] Transmiss Syst Operator GAZ SYST SA, PL-02337 Warsaw, Poland
[5] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Stord, Norway
关键词
Natural gas pipeline; Transient non-isothermal flow; Gas quality tracking; Advective mass transport; Pipeline flow simulation; Implicit method; DISTRIBUTED INJECTION; NETWORKS; SYSTEMS; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jngse.2018.03.014
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Tracking changes in gas composition in natural gas pipeline transport systems is becoming increasingly important to pipeline operators, since gas suppliers are shifting from long-term delivery contracts to shorter-term contracts, increasing delivery of gases from unconventional sources, and proposing to inject hydrogen and biomethane into the natural gas networks. The present study investigates two methods for tracking gas composition, one using a moving grid method, and one solving the advection equation using an implicit backward difference method. The methods were applied to a model of an onshore pipeline in the Polish transmission system, and a model of an offshore pipeline in the Norwegian transmission system. The differences between the measured and modeled compositions and transport times were investigated. Both methods reproduced the measured compositions and transport times well, with an error in total transport times of less than 2.0%. The implicit method was found to lose some of the finer details of the gas composition profiles due to numerical diffusion, while the moving grid method preserved the composition profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 330
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Steady state analysis of gas networks with distributed injection of alternative gas [J].
Abeysekera, M. ;
Wu, J. ;
Jenkins, N. ;
Rees, M. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 164 :991-1002
[2]   Simulation of natural gas quality distribution for pipeline systems [J].
Chaczykowski, Maciej ;
Zarodkiewicz, Pawei .
ENERGY, 2017, 134 :681-698
[3]   Transient flow in natural gas pipeline - The effect of pipeline thermal model [J].
Chaczykowski, Maciej .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2010, 34 (04) :1051-1067
[5]   RANDOM CHOICE SOLUTION OF HYPERBOLIC SYSTEMS [J].
CHORIN, AJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1976, 22 (04) :517-533
[6]  
Clausen S., 2016, P 26 INT OFFSH POL E
[7]  
Colebrook C. F., 1939, J. Inst. Civ. Eng, V12, P393, DOI [10.1680/ijoti.1939.13150, DOI 10.1680/IJOTI.1939.13150, 10.1680/ijoti.1939.14509, DOI 10.1680/IJOTI.1939.14509]
[8]  
Daneshyar H., 1976, ONE DIMENSIONAL COMP
[9]  
Gassco, 2015, ANN REPORT
[10]   Dynamic modeling of natural gas quality within transport pipelines in presence of hydrogen injections [J].
Guandalini, Giulio ;
Colbertaldo, Paolo ;
Campanari, Stefano .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 185 :1712-1723