Fake it 'til you make it: Examining faking ability on social media pages

被引:11
作者
Schroeder, Amber N. [1 ]
Cavanaugh, Jacqulyn M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Psychol, Box 19528,313 Life Sci, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Western Kentucky Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, 1906 Coll Hts Blvd 22030, Bowling Green, KY 42101 USA
关键词
Faking; Self-presentation; Impression management; Social networking; Facebook; Social media; PERSONALITY MEASURES; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SELF-PRESENTATION; APPLICANT FAKING; BEHAVIOR; INFORMATION; EXPERIENCE; DECISIONS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.011
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The current study investigated job applicant faking ability on Facebook, including an examination of various individual differences and strategies predictive of faking success. Using an experimental design, results indicated that individuals are able to manipulate Facebook profiles in order to convey a certain image. Individual difference predictors of faking ability included age, daily Facebook usage, cognitive ability, Facebook impression motivation, self-monitoring ability and sensitivity, and neuroticism. Individuals used slightly different modification strategies across conditions, and interestingly, the most effective strategy, removing statuses, was a significant predictor of faking ability in only the "fake good" condition, which is consistent with research on negative salience effects. Profile suitability ratings provided by three independent raters demonstrated high inter-rater reliability, but low inter-rater agreement. Of the examined Facebook profile components, wall posts and likes emerged as significant predictors of overall suitability ratings. Thus, these findings highlight potential concerns regarding the use of social networking sites as applicant evaluation tools in organizational contexts. Future research directions are suggested. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 35
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Social Media Update 2014
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, HDB PERSONALITY THEO
[3]   Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idealization [J].
Back, Mitja D. ;
Stopfer, Juliane M. ;
Vazire, Simine ;
Gaddis, Sam ;
Schmukle, Stefan C. ;
Egloff, Boris ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 21 (03) :372-374
[4]   Moral cognition: Explaining the gender difference in antisocial behavior [J].
Barriga, AQ ;
Morrison, EM .
MERRILL-PALMER QUARTERLY-JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 47 (04) :532-562
[5]   A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures [J].
Birkeland, Scott A. ;
Manson, Todd M. ;
Kisamore, Jennifer L. ;
Brannick, Michael T. ;
Smith, Mark A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2006, 14 (04) :317-335
[6]  
Blasi A., 2005, Character Psychology and Character Education, P67
[7]   Raven's advanced progressive matrices: Norms for first-year university students and the development of a short form [J].
Bors, DA ;
Stokes, TL .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1998, 58 (03) :382-398
[8]   SELF-PRESENTATION DYNAMICS ON OVERT INTEGRITY TESTS - EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE REID REPORT [J].
CUNNINGHAM, MR ;
WONG, DT ;
BARBEE, AP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 79 (05) :643-658
[9]  
Dipboye R.L., 1999, The employment interview handbook, P229, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452205519.N15
[10]  
Frei R. L, 1997, THESIS