Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons

被引:40
作者
Soto, Fabian A. [1 ]
Wasserman, Edward A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Psychol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
object recognition; categorization; invariance; learning; pigeon; DEPTH-ROTATED OBJECTS; VISUAL CATEGORIZATION; AVIAN TELENCEPHALON; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; BASAL GANGLIA; COLUMBA-LIVIA; CATEGORICAL DISCRIMINATION; DOPAMINERGIC INNERVATION; CAUDOLATERAL NEOSTRIATUM; FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE;
D O I
10.3389/fncir.2014.00122
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Behavioral studies of object recognition in pigeons have been conducted for 50 years, yielding a large body of data. Recent work has been directed toward synthesizing this evidence and understanding the visual, associative, and cognitive mechanisms that are involved. The outcome is that pigeons are likely to be the non-primate species for which the computational mechanisms of object recognition are best understood. Here, we review this research and suggest that a core set of mechanisms for object recognition might be present in all vertebrates, including pigeons and people, making pigeons an excellent candidate model to study the neural mechanisms of object recognition. Behavioral and computational evidence suggests that error-driven learning participates in object category learning by pigeons and people, and recent neuroscientific research suggests that the basal ganglia, which are homologous in these species, may implement error-driven learning of stimulus-response associations. Furthermore, learning of abstract category representations can be observed in pigeons and other vertebrates. Finally, there is evidence that feedforward visual processing, a central mechanism in models of object recognition in the primate ventral stream, plays a role in object recognition by pigeons. We also highlight differences between pigeons and people in object recognition abilities, and propose candidate adaptive specializations which may explain them, such as holistic face processing and rule-based category learning in primates. From a modern comparative perspective, such specializations are to be expected regardless of the model species under study. The fact that we have a good idea of which aspects of object recognition differ in people and pigeons should be seen as an advantage over other animal models. From this perspective, we suggest that there is much to learn about human object recognition from studying the "simple" brains of pigeons.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 213 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ANIMALS SEE WORLD
[2]   Differences between Neural Activity in Prefrontal Cortex and Striatum during Learning of Novel Abstract Categories [J].
Antzoulatos, Evan G. ;
Miller, Earl K. .
NEURON, 2011, 71 (02) :243-249
[3]  
Ashby F. G., OXFORD HDB COMPUTATI
[4]  
Ashby F.G., 2005, Handbook of categorisation in cognitive science, P548
[5]   The role of the basal ganglia in category learning [J].
Ashby, F. Gregory ;
Ennis, John M. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION: ADVANCES IN RESEARCH AND THEORY, VOL 46, 2006, 46 :1-36
[6]   The neurobiology of human category learning [J].
Ashby, FG ;
Ell, SW .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2001, 5 (05) :204-210
[7]   A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning [J].
Ashby, FG ;
Alfonso-Reese, LA ;
Turken, AU ;
Waldron, EM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 105 (03) :442-481
[8]   Novelty and functional equivalence in superordinate categorization by pigeons [J].
Astley, SL ;
Wasserman, EA .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 26 (02) :125-138
[9]   Superordinate category formation in pigeons: Association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent [J].
Astley, SL ;
Wasserman, EA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIORAL PROCESSES, 1999, 25 (04) :415-432
[10]   CATEGORICAL DISCRIMINATION AND GENERALIZATION IN PIGEONS - ALL NEGATIVE STIMULI ARE NOT CREATED EQUAL [J].
ASTLEY, SL ;
WASSERMAN, EA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1992, 18 (02) :193-207